Re: Pylibmc Support: Part 2

2010-10-11 Thread Jacob Burch
On Oct 8, 12:36 am, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > * Pylibmc 1.1 doesn't play that nice with mod_wsgi due to it's use of > > the Simplified GIL API > > (see:http://www.dctrwatson.com/2010/09/beware-of-using-pylibmc-1-1-and-mod...). > > Probably just need to make note of it in the documentation, b

Re: Pylibmc Support: Part 2

2010-10-08 Thread Jeremy Dunck
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: ... > Also, are there any API-level discrepancies remaining that need to be > considered? The earlier django-dev thread suggests that there are some > problems with get_multi(), but it also says that they've been fixed. > Is this the case?

Re: Pylibmc Support: Part 2

2010-10-08 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Jacob Burch wrote: > Bringing this back for more design decision discussion. I've started a > (very basic) wiki page with a brief summation of the situation here: > http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/PylibmcSupport > > Of note from that wiki page are three main iss

Pylibmc Support: Part 2

2010-10-07 Thread Jacob Burch
Bringing this back for more design decision discussion. I've started a (very basic) wiki page with a brief summation of the situation here: http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/PylibmcSupport Of note from that wiki page are three main issues I raised with various django developers while at Django Co