Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> So, once again, it was Jeremy stirring the pot and it's you keeping the
> issue alive a couple of years later.
Well, the issue wasn't resolved. What could I do? :-)
> I think the comments and requests for information Younger Me made in
> that thread are still valid. T
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 11:20 +0300, Ivan Sagalaev wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This Malcolm's reply in a nearby thread:
>
> > Unless you're
> > using really huge querysets, the memory usage is not going to kill you.
> > Pulling back the huge number of results already uses a bunch of memory
> > and that's
Hello!
This Malcolm's reply in a nearby thread:
> Unless you're
> using really huge querysets, the memory usage is not going to kill you.
> Pulling back the huge number of results already uses a bunch of memory
> and that's a property of the db wrapper.
... has reminded me that this behavior wa
