Re: Proposal: django.models.core/auth should be regular apps

2006-01-09 Thread Joseph Kocherhans
On 1/9/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/8/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here's a status update on moving dango.contib.core/auth into django.contirb: > >> > > * Remove Package model (and dependencies on it) > > Ian Holsman still uses this. I'm things we

Re: Proposal: django.models.core/auth should be regular apps

2006-01-09 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 1/8/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's a status update on moving dango.contib.core/auth into django.contirb: > > * Move sessions from core to django.contrib.sessions (and change dependencies) > Done. > > * Move sites from core to django.contrib.sites (and change dependenc

Re: Proposal: django.models.core/auth should be regular apps

2006-01-08 Thread Joseph Kocherhans
Here's a status update on moving dango.contib.core/auth into django.contirb: * Move sessions from core to django.contrib.sessions (and change dependencies) Done. * Move sites from core to django.contrib.sites (and change dependencies) Done. * Move auth to django.contrib.admin (and change depend

Re: Proposal: django.models.core/auth should be regular apps

2006-01-07 Thread Ivan Fedorov
Ian Holsman пишет: > Hi. > I'm using packages. > I think it is a good place to put stuff like package-specific preferences. > > ie.. the preference of the text markup you would like > (bbcode/markup/textile) is stored against the 'text' package. > > if you like delicious/furl/digg is stored ag

Re: Proposal: django.models.core/auth should be regular apps

2006-01-06 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 1/6/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Move auth to django.contrib.admin (and change dependencies) > > Did you mean move auth to django.contrib.auth here? Or do you really > want it moved into admin? My mistake -- I meant django.contrib.auth. Adrian -- Adrian Holovaty hol

Re: Proposal: django.models.core/auth should be regular apps

2006-01-06 Thread Joseph Kocherhans
On 1/6/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Move auth to django.contrib.admin (and change dependencies) Did you mean move auth to django.contrib.auth here? Or do you really want it moved into admin? Joseph

Re: Proposal: django.models.core/auth should be regular apps

2006-01-06 Thread Joseph Kocherhans
On 1/6/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi. > I'm using packages. > I think it is a good place to put stuff like package-specific preferences. I'm going to leave them as is for now. There's actually quite a bit that depends on them that I need to take a closer look at. I'm starting

Re: Proposal: django.models.core/auth should be regular apps

2006-01-06 Thread Ian Holsman
Hi. I'm using packages. I think it is a good place to put stuff like package-specific preferences. ie.. the preference of the text markup you would like (bbcode/markup/textile) is stored against the 'text' package. if you like delicious/furl/digg is stored against the 'bookmark' package. FWIW

Re: Proposal: django.models.core/auth should be regular apps

2006-01-06 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 1/6/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should sites be installed by init? I think it's used rarely enough > that it shouldn't. It's used by various bits and pieces, such as the RSS and redirect frameworks, that need to know the fully-qualified domain name for an object. Maybe t

Re: Proposal: django.models.core/auth should be regular apps

2006-01-06 Thread Joseph Kocherhans
On 1/6/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If no one is using packages I'll just drop it. > > This is a bit easier said than done...The content-types table depends > on it. How about splitting this patch into several stages -- > > * Move sessions from core to django.contrib.sessio

Re: Proposal: django.models.core/auth should be regular apps

2006-01-06 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 1/6/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now that I think about it a little more I agree that core should be split > into: > > django.contrib.sessions > django.contrib.sites Sounds good. > If no one is using packages I'll just drop it. This is a bit easier said than done...The

Re: Proposal: django.models.core/auth should be regular apps

2006-01-06 Thread Joseph Kocherhans
On 1/6/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One more idea, though, would be to split "core" into > django.contrib.sessions, django.contrib.contenttypes and > django.contrib.sites. Packages would go away, because they're not > really necessary (we used them heavily about 1.5 years ago

Re: Proposal: django.models.core/auth should be regular apps

2006-01-06 Thread Joseph Kocherhans
On 1/6/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/6/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Treating django.models.core and django.models.auth as special cases is > > kind of confusing. They should be regular apps, but we don't want to > > have to add 2 extra steps (insta

Re: Proposal: django.models.core/auth should be regular apps

2006-01-06 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 1/6/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Treating django.models.core and django.models.auth as special cases is > kind of confusing. They should be regular apps, but we don't want to > have to add 2 extra steps (installing the 2 apps) to get a django > project up and running. Here

Proposal: django.models.core/auth should be regular apps

2006-01-06 Thread Joseph Kocherhans
Treating django.models.core and django.models.auth as special cases is kind of confusing. They should be regular apps, but we don't want to have to add 2 extra steps (installing the 2 apps) to get a django project up and running. Here's a few ideas for fixing the problems. Create 2 new apps, djan