On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 11:57 -0800, jothan wrote:
> PsycoPg2 with a remote DB over a WAN is deadly slow. Since PsycoPg2
> supports connection pooling, I have decided to patch the Django DB
> adapter to use this. I could see this implemented as below (this is a
> very rough draft). For example, min
This sounds like a good feature, however, it's very difficult to read
a patch in either email or on google groups, so could you please open
a ticket in trac, and post this as a patch there.
On Nov 16, 2:57 pm, jothan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PsycoPg2 with a remote DB over a WAN is deadly slow
PsycoPg2 with a remote DB over a WAN is deadly slow. Since PsycoPg2
supports connection pooling, I have decided to patch the Django DB
adapter to use this. I could see this implemented as below (this is a
very rough draft). For example, min and max connections should not be
hardcoded.
Let me know
