Hi Nadège,
Sorry for the delay. Yeah, when I was working on PR 8981, I ran into the
symmetrical case and wasn't sure what the behavior should be, so I left the
check in place to not allow the behavior. I asked my self the same question
you did about possibly needing "through_reverse_defaults" a
Thank you for the feedback :)
For reference:
Ticket https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/30421
Pull request https://github.com/django/django/pull/11298
Le vendredi 26 avril 2019 19:13:29 UTC+2, Aymeric Augustin a écrit :
>
> Hello Nadège,
>
> While I'm not an expert of this area, your proposal m
After reading your reasoning and code it seems logical for me. Let's create
a pr for more input.
On Tuesday, April 23, 2019 at 6:13:35 PM UTC+6, Nadège Michel wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We use self.referencing ManyToMany relationships with intermediate tables
> in our work project
> and I was wond
Hello Nadège,
While I'm not an expert of this area, your proposal makes sense to me. It looks
like a reasonable extension of previous work. You can go ahead with a ticket
and a pull request.
Best regards,
--
Aymeric.
> On 23 Apr 2019, at 12:09, Nadège Michel wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We us
Hello,
We use self.referencing ManyToMany relationships with intermediate tables
in our work project
and I was wondering why we had to create ourselves the reverse link when we
need the relationship to be symmetrical.
I looked at the 'symmetrical' attribute documentation and though we should
