> Jeremy Dunck wrote:
>> As for close rates and other useful metrics, yeah, those should be
>> more visible. :)
Marty Alchin wrote:
> I've wondered about building a Trac plug-in to monitor those types of
> things and provide reports. There's a wealth of information in Trac
> just waiting to be m
On 11/11/07, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for close rates and other useful metrics, yeah, those should be
> more visible. :)
I've wondered about building a Trac plug-in to monitor those types of
things and provide reports. There's a wealth of information in Trac
just waiting to b
On Nov 10, 2007 9:32 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I dunno ... gut feeling is we need more layers here, we already have
> triagers who are volunteering and doing a pretty good job.
If I understood the rest of your reply correctly, you meant we *don't*
need more layers here.
But I don't know how easy that
will be, because a lot of it is opinion and feeling and that's hard to
convey and document.
> If we could get the ratio up to 4 of 5, would that make a significant
> difference in inclusion speed, or is it still the committer's time to
> rev
eed, or is it still the committer's time to
review that slows it down? How many hours in a week (month?) do
committers spend on patch polishing?
-Jeremy
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Dja
