I would say it's not so much about the speed, but the memory overhead that
is caused by creating these objects.
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Ken Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2:29 pm, "Gary Wilson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, one of the benefits of values()
On May 23, 2:29 pm, "Gary Wilson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, one of the benefits of values() returning a dict is that you
> avoid the more expensive model instance creation when you don't need it.
I wouldn't be so quick to assume that creating model instances (or
ducks that look li
Nope it's just something I was throwing around.
What would exclude do in that example? I feel it should be explicit rather
than implicit (although I do see the reason for implicit calls where you
don't want to return text/blob fields, but explicit is always better).
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:18 P
David Cramer wrote:
> IMO show() and hide() are extremely ugly. And I think .values() is becoming
> ugly with the addition of values_tuple or whatever it's called. I don't see
> a real good reason to clutter the namespace even more than it already is.
> I'd rather have .values(type=dict) or someth
IMO show() and hide() are extremely ugly. And I think .values() is becoming
ugly with the addition of values_tuple or whatever it's called. I don't see
a real good reason to clutter the namespace even more than it already is.
I'd rather have .values(type=dict) or something similar.
On Fri, May 23,
David Cramer wrote:
> I'd like to present my concept for partial models, which would be an
> attempt to replace the use of .values() returning a dictionary
> (although .values() still has uses if you dont actually want an
> instance). Keep in mind, the way I'm presenting this would keep #17
> work
Sort of, although I'm going to go against Adrian on the hide() method (I'd
rather be explicit than implicit).
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:35 AM, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to present my
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:35 AM, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like to present my concept for partial models, which would be an
...
> When the proxy is instanced, we would identify which fields are
> currently available, and map those in. We would also similarly make
> sure a
I'd like to present my concept for partial models, which would be an
attempt to replace the use of .values() returning a dictionary
(although .values() still has uses if you dont actually want an
instance). Keep in mind, the way I'm presenting this would keep #17
working :)
values, values_tuple,
