Re: One more issue with file storage

2008-07-10 Thread David Larlet
Le 10 juil. 08 à 21:11, Marty Alchin a écrit : > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> This was also influenced by the Amazon S3 API which was going to be >> implemented as an alternate strategy for this project. > > There's also work being done on

Re: One more issue with file storage

2008-07-10 Thread Marty Alchin
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for the late reply. I meant to look at this awhile ago but it > slipped off my plate for a bit. Looking at the latest patch > (filestorage.16.diff) it does look like a similar approach the main > differences comi

Re: One more issue with file storage

2008-07-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for the late reply. I meant to look at this awhile ago but it slipped off my plate for a bit. Looking at the latest patch (filestorage.16.diff) it does look like a similar approach the main differences coming from my need to monkey patch this functionality over a stock Django install. It loo

Re: One more issue with file storage

2008-06-13 Thread Marty Alchin
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been implementing a flexible file storage system for Django for > my own use (hacked in on top of the existing file field) and would be > happy to make this code available if you have any interest in it. I > hones

Re: One more issue with file storage

2008-06-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been implementing a flexible file storage system for Django for my own use (hacked in on top of the existing file field) and would be happy to make this code available if you have any interest in it. I honestly didn't know someone was working in this area or I would have gotten involved soone

Re: One more issue with file storage

2008-06-12 Thread David Larlet
Le 9 juin 08 à 19:11, Marty Alchin a écrit : > I've been fairly quiet on the file storage front for a while, since > it's basically done now, and is just waiting on the streaming upload > ticket to hit trunk first. Since I got to that point, however, I've > had two different people, working on tw

Re: One more issue with file storage

2008-06-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think your solution works, but as you already said, it's a bit verbose. I actually don't see the problem with having the additional arguments. Each backend constructor would have to have a trailing **kwargs, and could pick and choose what it wants from the keyword arguments given. In your exa

One more issue with file storage

2008-06-09 Thread Marty Alchin
Hey all, I've been fairly quiet on the file storage front for a while, since it's basically done now, and is just waiting on the streaming upload ticket to hit trunk first. Since I got to that point, however, I've had two different people, working on two different storage backends, both approach