Re: ORM refactoring, part 2

2012-09-26 Thread Jonas Obrist
n Saturday, August 25, 2012 9:35:02 PM UTC+2, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > > I have done some more ORM refactoring work. I thought it would be a > good idea to post a summary of what is going on. > > First, I haven't committed the utils.tree refactoring patch I was > planning to co

Re: ORM refactoring, part 2

2012-09-25 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote: > My view is these things are 100% undocumented, 100% internal, anyone using > them is 100% on their on. Simply put, if we can't make changes to these APIs > without having to worry, what's the point in having a backwards > compatibility policy?

Re: ORM refactoring, part 2

2012-09-25 Thread Alex Gaynor
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Anssi Kääriäinen > wrote: > > I'd like to postpone these to early next month so that I have more > > time to help in reviews and pushing some new features in. Other > > options are postponing review work,

Re: ORM refactoring, part 2

2012-09-25 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > I'd like to postpone these to early next month so that I have more > time to help in reviews and pushing some new features in. Other > options are postponing review work, and postponing these patches to > 1.6. As long as the changes are i

Re: ORM refactoring, part 2

2012-09-25 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
On 25 elo, 22:35, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > I have done some more ORM refactoring work. I thought it would be a > good idea to post a summary of what is going on. > > First, I haven't committed the utils.tree refactoring patch I was > planning to commit [https://github.com/aka

Re: ORM refactoring, part 2

2012-08-27 Thread Luke Plant
Anssi, I just got back from holiday. I hope to be able to review at least some of these patches within the next 2 weeks. If you don't hear from me in that time, I'd encourage you to carry on anyway. Thanks, Luke On 25/08/12 20:35, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > I have done some more OR

Re: ORM refactoring, part 2

2012-08-25 Thread Alex Gaynor
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: > I have done some more ORM refactoring work. I thought it would be a > good idea to post a summary of what is going on. > > First, I haven't committed the utils.tree refactoring patch I was > planning to commit

ORM refactoring, part 2

2012-08-25 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
I have done some more ORM refactoring work. I thought it would be a good idea to post a summary of what is going on. First, I haven't committed the utils.tree refactoring patch I was planning to commit [https://github.com/akaariai/django/commits/ refactor_utils_tree]. The reason is that

Re: ORM refactoring

2011-10-10 Thread Jonas H.
On 10/10/2011 04:59 PM, Anssi Kääriäinen wrote: In the perfect world you could have a SQLA backend, or qs.as_sqla() method. That would be neat, yes. QuerySet chaining could be hard to implement, though (or does SQLA have support for something like that?). But in my opinion this is another argumen

Re: ORM refactoring

2011-10-10 Thread Carl Meyer
o know if there is support > for ORM refactoring. I am not sure the "wrapper around SQLAlchemy" idea is at all feasible, for any number of reasons; it's certainly not an idea that should hold up other improvements. I do think there are parts of the ORM that could really benefit from

Re: ORM refactoring

2011-10-10 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
On Oct 10, 4:13 pm, Luke Plant wrote: > One of the problems is that it can be very hard to review refactorings. > For example, I recently checked in rev 16929 [1] from ivan_virabyan's > patch, and reviewing it was hard, despite the fact that it was a very > good quality patch. The difficulty is

Re: ORM refactoring

2011-10-10 Thread Luke Plant
decide that the ORM > is just fine now, or that there are higher importance items. Before > continuing my hacking, it would be nice to know if there is support > for ORM refactoring. It was me who suggested the idea of basing the ORM on SQLAlchemy in future, on my blog [2]. It would be

Re: ORM refactoring

2011-10-09 Thread Alexander Schepanovski
it a wrapper around SQLAlchemy > (I saw this mentioned somewhere some time ago). Or decide that the ORM > is just fine now, or that there are higher importance items. Before > continuing my hacking, it would be nice to know if there is support > for ORM refactoring. > > Thank you f

ORM refactoring

2011-10-09 Thread Anssi Kääriäinen
. Before continuing my hacking, it would be nice to know if there is support for ORM refactoring. Thank you for your time, - Anssi Kääriäinen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email