On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:46 PM, daonb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So we want a roadmap, to better help with ticket triage. You can reply
> with -1 or 0 if you don't like the idea
I very much doubt anyone is against a roadmap.
Again, Djangocon _just_ started. Let me quote Jacob from this very
> Er, Django 1.0 was only released _3 days_ ago. You know people are
> literally sitting down to the start of Djangocon right now, right?
Sorry, but I don't. I know it's been a tremendous effort and a great
achievement to get 1.0 out on time and I'm thankful for all those who
contributed. I'm no
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 11:41 AM, daonb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jacob, please release a roadmap ASAP or let us know what version we
> should use for new tickets. It's important to have a roadmap (and I'm
> +1 for grasshoper's suggestion)
Er, Django 1.0 was only released _3 days_ ago. You kno
I'm with the grasshoper. We've been patient for quite a while, but we
need a release framework so us mortals (==non-core developers) can
safely post ticketsm. We've been quite, not wanting to interfere with
the crucial work of releasing 1.0, but we have alot of good ideas that
need documentation
J
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:15 AM, mrts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Once back online, a bit of release planning + corresponding new
> milestones in Trac would come in handy for ticket triagers to
> categorize tickets.
Patience, grasshopper :)
Yes, we'll add new milestones, but I think we have to,
Hopefully the devs are taking a well-deserved break now as 1.0 is
out :)
Once back online, a bit of release planning + corresponding new
milestones in Trac would come in handy for ticket triagers to
categorize tickets.
I'd propose something in the lines of the following (and I'd really
prefer no
