Gary wrote:
> I also agree that the new home should be down a level, but again
> disagree with the 'auth' abbreviation. Perhaps django.authen?
Actually, I like the "everything should be an app" thinking. And if
that is the case, all apps should go in one directory (seems to be
/django/contrib).
Joseph Kocherhans wrote:
> RequestUserMiddleware is a horribly ugly name, and in the latest diff
> attatched to http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1428 I've renamed it
> to MultiAuthMiddleware. I'm wondering if people think it would be
> worthwhile to add something else called AuthMiddleware tha
On 3/3/06, Linicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think that it's important to have a default authentication system
> similar to the current one.
Agreed. I didn't mean to suggest that MultiAuthMiddleware would
require any more configuration or work differently out of the box than
Django does cu
"""RequestUserMiddleware is a horribly ugly name, and in the
latest diff
attatched to http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1428 I've renamed it
to MultiAuthMiddleware. I'm wondering if people think it would be
worthwhile to add something else called AuthMiddleware that would do
more or less what d
RequestUserMiddleware is a horribly ugly name, and in the latest diff
attatched to http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1428 I've renamed it
to MultiAuthMiddleware. I'm wondering if people think it would be
worthwhile to add something else called AuthMiddleware that would do
more or less what djan
