Re: Multi-auth branch

2006-07-04 Thread Adrian Holovaty
On 7/4/06, Douglas Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It was merged already, should I fix the wiki start page? I've taken care of it. Thanks for the pointer! Adrian -- Adrian Holovaty holovaty.com | djangoproject.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this mes

Multi-auth branch

2006-07-04 Thread Douglas Campos
It was merged already, should I fix the wiki start page? Multiple authentication backends: the multi-auth branch of Django, currently under development, is abstracting the authentication backend to make it easier to use other authentication systems like LDAP. Check out the documentation to see

Re: multi-auth branch... time to merge?

2006-05-31 Thread Jason F. McBrayer
"Ramiro Morales" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 5/30/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Has anyone tested out the multi-auth branch yet? I haven't heard >> anything, so either people aren't using it, or it's work

Re: multi-auth branch... time to merge?

2006-05-30 Thread Ramiro Morales
Joseph, On 5/30/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has anyone tested out the multi-auth branch yet? I haven't heard > anything, so either people aren't using it, or it's working well and > the docs are good enough. Personally, I've been

Re: multi-auth branch... time to merge?

2006-05-30 Thread Matthew Flanagan
On 5/31/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has anyone tested out the multi-auth branch yet? I haven't heard > anything, so either people aren't using it, or it's working well and > the docs are good enough. Personally, I've been usin

Re: multi-auth branch... time to merge?

2006-05-30 Thread Steven Armstrong
On 05/30/06 20:33, Joseph Kocherhans wrote: > Has anyone tested out the multi-auth branch yet? I haven't heard > anything, so either people aren't using it, or it's working well and > the docs are good enough. Personally, I've been using it with both > external

multi-auth branch... time to merge?

2006-05-30 Thread Joseph Kocherhans
Has anyone tested out the multi-auth branch yet? I haven't heard anything, so either people aren't using it, or it's working well and the docs are good enough. Personally, I've been using it with both external SQL and LDAP backends for over a month now. No issues, but my a

Re: ANN: multi-auth branch ready for testing

2006-05-16 Thread Joseph Kocherhans
On 5/16/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > perhaps the settings.py auth > backend might make better example code (perhaps in the "writing auth > backends" doc?) since it's actually pretty insecure :) Good call. Done in [2924] Joseph --~--~-~--~~~---~-

Re: ANN: multi-auth branch ready for testing

2006-05-16 Thread Jonathan Daugherty
# Since this stuff is optional I wouldn't be opposed to including # well- written auth backends to services like OpenID in # django.contrib.auth... probably worth judging on a case-by-case # basis. I know some work on OpenID + Django has already been done, but I'd be glad to help out with it, as

Re: ANN: multi-auth branch ready for testing

2006-05-16 Thread Jacob Kaplan-Moss
On May 16, 2006, at 3:11 PM, Joseph Kocherhans wrote: > Anyone interested in mutiple authentication backends should check out > http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/MultipleAuthBackends w00t! > At this point only 2 backends are included, one that checks > django.contrib.auth.models.User, and one t

ANN: multi-auth branch ready for testing

2006-05-16 Thread Joseph Kocherhans
Anyone interested in mutiple authentication backends should check out http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/MultipleAuthBackends I've updated the authentication docs to cover the new changes, and the code is ready to go. A self proclaimed newbie has already posted an example LDAP backend to the wiki