On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Jared Kuolt wrote:
> I propose that the core team set a timeline to resolve this, one way
> or another, with input from the community.
If we could agree on a common server format that let anyone use any
DVCS they chose on their personal machines, then we'd get th
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 5:10 PM, James Bennett wrote:
> Personally, my opinion is that there are good bridges from all the
> popular DVCS tools to Subversion, and that choice of DVCS is such a
> flamewar topic right now that it's best to stick with the lowest
> common denominator -- people can us
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Jared Kuolt wrote:
> Please correct me if my interpretation is wrong (for example, is there
> a show-stopper about which the community is not aware?).
Personally, my opinion is that there are good bridges from all the
popular DVCS tools to Subversion, and that ch
Having talked to several people at DjangoCon about this, I would like
to start a formal discussion here. It was asked of the Django Core Dev
panel, why had the project not yet moved to a distributed version
control system? My interpretation of the answer was that there is
little incentive for the
