Re: Making WSGIHandler the only handler / mod_python support

2010-06-23 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Gert Van Gool wrote: > So in theory, if you change the mod_python handler to one of the projects > mentioned (like paste.modwsgi). > mod_python is "promoted" to the same status as FastCGI? I'm not sure I understand your question. I suppose the approach of using p

Re: Making WSGIHandler the only handler / mod_python support

2010-06-23 Thread Gert Van Gool
So in theory, if you change the mod_python handler to one of the projects mentioned (like paste.modwsgi). mod_python is "promoted" to the same status as FastCGI? -- Gert Mobile: +32 498725202 Web: http://gert.selentic.net On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 13:43, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Wed, Jun

Re: Making WSGIHandler the only handler / mod_python support

2010-06-23 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Tom Evans wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Gustavo Narea wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm going to work on some patches to improve WSGI support, and I found >> something that, if changed, could make my patches and django.core.handlers >> simpler... As well as

Re: Making WSGIHandler the only handler / mod_python support

2010-06-23 Thread Tom Evans
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Gustavo Narea wrote: > Hello, > > I'm going to work on some patches to improve WSGI support, and I found > something that, if changed, could make my patches and django.core.handlers > simpler... As well as make it possible to use WSGI middleware with Django > unde

Re: Making WSGIHandler the only handler / mod_python support

2010-06-23 Thread Gustavo Narea
Hello, On 23 June, 01:00, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Gustavo Narea wrote: > > To sum up, I'm proposing two things: > >  1.- Making the WSGI handler the only handler. > >  2.- If we want to keep mod_python support, use a mod_python<->WSGI wrapper. > > > What do

Re: Making WSGIHandler the only handler / mod_python support

2010-06-22 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Gustavo Narea wrote: > To sum up, I'm proposing two things: >  1.- Making the WSGI handler the only handler. >  2.- If we want to keep mod_python support, use a mod_python<->WSGI wrapper. > > What do you think? As noted in a separate thread -- we're looking to de

Re: Making WSGIHandler the only handler / mod_python support

2010-06-22 Thread Robert Coup
Nice timing :) On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Gustavo Narea wrote: > > I'm going to work on some patches to improve WSGI support, and I found > something that, if changed, could make my patches and django.core.handlers > simpler... As well as make it possible to use WSGI middleware with Django

Making WSGIHandler the only handler / mod_python support

2010-06-22 Thread Gustavo Narea
Hello, I'm going to work on some patches to improve WSGI support, and I found something that, if changed, could make my patches and django.core.handlers simpler... As well as make it possible to use WSGI middleware with Django under mod_python. At the moment, Django has two so-called handlers: