On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Marty Alchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I certainly hope 1.0 alpha isn't about hitting the
> backwards-compatible limit yet, because if it is, #5361 has failed to
> make the cut in time. The way I understand it, we still have some time
> to introduce mild incomp
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Chris Hasenpflug <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've opened #7867 for regressiontests.model_inheritance_regress
> failures against MySQL. I've marked it 1.0 beta for now, but
> depending on requirements of the test suite passing before tagging a
> release. it ma
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If there's anything that absolutely *MUST* be in 1.0 alpha, speak up
> now. Please keep in mind that the alpha release is intended only for
> the "must-have" features, which are now all in. This means that the
> only
I've opened #7867 for regressiontests.model_inheritance_regress
failures against MySQL. I've marked it 1.0 beta for now, but
depending on requirements of the test suite passing before tagging a
release. it may need to reassigned. It looks like a mix-up of True/1
and False/0, but I havent really
On Jul 21, 12:04 pm, "Karen Tracey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you saying these JUST started failing for MySQL? This True/1 False/0
> issue has been known for a while (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7190
> ).
Wow...I'm on a roll today, lol. Somehow I didn't manage to find that
one i
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gah, I really haven't had time to do the
> move-code-out-of-__init__-modules dance. I'm fairly certain that
> it'll be completely backwards compatible (via re-importing back into
> __init__), though, so I'm not too worried;
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Gary Wilson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not at OSCON, but I can take care of #7864 (docs renaming), as I've
> got a patch already in the works.
Cool - go ahead and check that in; I'll give it a quick skim-over but
doc fixes are easily done a bit after if
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Karen Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it would be good if #7414 was fixed for alpha.
Good call. I'm on 10.5 here so I can test it and get it done.
Jacob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are s
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> [If you happen to be at OSCON I'll be working on 1.0 alpha on the
> lower floor over by the Starbucks if you wanna come over and help
> out.]
I'm not at OSCON, but I can take care of #7864 (docs renaming), as I've
got a patch already in the works.
Gary
--~--~
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If there's anything that absolutely *MUST* be in 1.0 alpha, speak up
> now. Please keep in mind that the alpha release is intended only for
> the "must-have" features, which are now all in. This means that the
> only
Hi folks --
Well, with #285 fixed (thanks, Malcolm!) we're looking pretty good to
release 1.0 alpha later today. Time-wise I think the plan is to do the
release late this afternoon (CST), but that's really up to James.
There's still a few tickets open in the 1.0 alpha milestone
(http://code.djan
11 matches
Mail list logo
