Should GenericForeignKey really implement m2m_*? (was Re: GenericRelation DROP generation problems)

2007-10-22 Thread Andrew Durdin
On 10/19/07, jdietrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can someone review the patch I've attached to ticket 3480 and verify > that it is sane? I think that should close out both #3480 and #3549, > and it seems a bit more kosher than the patch on #3549 It looks OK to me, rather along the lines of t

GenericRelation DROP generation problems

2007-10-19 Thread jdietrich
I've been bit by a problem with GenericRelations, whereby reset/ sqlreset will generate duplicate DROP statements. This seems to be described under ticket #3549. #3480 also seems to describe an uglier edge case of this - GenericRelation resulting in DROPs that cross application boundaries. Can so