On Apr 7, 4:59 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> As an aside: something I have learnt a couple of times: "is a" was a
> blunder on the part of the OO modelling people once you try to use the
> terms internationally. It sometimes becomes hard to explain in languages
> that don't
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> I have defined the following aliases in my models. It looks good
> except that ForeignKey has no support for specifying whether you want
> to cascade DELETEs to the foreign class. I'd like to point out that
> IsMy would provide a very simplistic implementation of
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 16:21 +, Rob Hudson wrote:
> On Apr 6, 3:51 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > [An unproven gut feeling: keeping a small reminder, however subliminal,
> > that things are relational-database backed is actually a good idea. It
> > will stop widely r
I have defined the following aliases in my models. It looks good
except that ForeignKey has no support for specifying whether you want
to cascade DELETEs to the foreign class. I'd like to point out that
IsMy would provide a very simplistic implementation of class
inheritance (with a named baseclas
On Apr 6, 3:51 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> [An unproven gut feeling: keeping a small reminder, however subliminal,
> that things are relational-database backed is actually a good idea. It
> will stop widely read people from thinking there is a true object
> backing store.
Jeff Forcier wrote:
> On Apr 6, 9:14 am, Nebojša Đorđević <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I already have some code for the `DELETE RESTRICT` case. It checking all
>> of the FK relations and forbids deletion (throws exception) if they
>> exist. If there are interest I can make patch, I just have t
Nebojša Đorđević wrote:
> OTOH, maybe validator is the better place for this?
(trying not to hijack the thread :) )
(also see http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1553)
Now when .96 is out I'm very interested on the status of the model level
validation.
This issue was delayed for a long time,
On Apr 6, 9:14 am, Nebojša Đorđević <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I already have some code for the `DELETE RESTRICT` case. It checking all
> of the FK relations and forbids deletion (throws exception) if they
> exist. If there are interest I can make patch, I just have to find out
> how to stop de
Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> However, underneath the name churn, there is an interesting idea - in
> your proposal, there is an important difference between "isA" and
> "IsMy". It looks like what you are trying to describe is an interface
> to the SQL "ON DELETE CASCADE". This could be done with a
Hi,
just a sidetrack comment regarding isA vs. isMy:
Russell Keith-Magee schrieb:
> However, underneath the name churn, there is an interesting idea - in
> your proposal, there is an important difference between "isA" and
> "IsMy". It looks like what you are trying to describe is an interface
>
Thanks for your remarks. First of all I'd like to add that I wouldn't
dream of replacing
the current API. I merely wanted to float the idea of a different API,
where relations were
described in a more abstract way. As I said I'm a bit of an outsider
so I focus on my use case
which currently is ra
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 10:07 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm new to Django so please forgive me if my question doesn't make
> sense or is addressed in the trunk/active branches. Also I'd like to
> start by saying that Django is a great piece of software, and that I
> appreciate th
On 4/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Remarks/trolls/thoughts welcome :)
Straight out name churning isn't open for debate. Is ForeignKey the
best name for a n-1 relation between models? This is a value
judgement, Ultimately, it doesn't matter if ForeignKey is renamed
WolfWhi
Hello,
I'm new to Django so please forgive me if my question doesn't make
sense or is addressed in the trunk/active branches. Also I'd like to
start by saying that Django is a great piece of software, and that I
appreciate that a lot of hard work went into it.
As an outsider I'm a bit puzzled by
14 matches
Mail list logo
