On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 10:06 -0600, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> On 11/6/07, Thomas Guettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > You can use a property. Code not tested:
>
> Of course. I just have about 30 places to do that legwork, which seems silly.
>
> I understand Malcolm's argument, though. This i
I had previously used OneToOne relationships and liked the auto
mapping they did, as in the OP's example. I was told that OneToOne
didn't work in some cases and was going away, and that I should use
ForeignKey(unique=True) instead.
If there are technical problems with OneToOne and
ForeignKey(uniq
On 11/6/07, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11/6/07, Thomas Guettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > You can use a property. Code not tested:
>
> Of course. I just have about 30 places to do that legwork, which seems silly.
Well, you could write up a function to create the prop
On 11/6/07, Thomas Guettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can use a property. Code not tested:
Of course. I just have about 30 places to do that legwork, which seems silly.
I understand Malcolm's argument, though. This is why I asked rather
than just making the small change in my local Dj
Am Montag, 5. November 2007 18:47 schrieb Jeremy Dunck:
> Consider:
>
> class Place(Model):
> ...
>
> class Retaurant(Model):
> place = ForeignKey(Place, unique=True)
>
You can use a property. Code not tested:
class Place(Model):
def get_restaurant(self):
try:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 11:47 -0600, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> Consider:
>
> class Place(Model):
> ...
>
> class Retaurant(Model):
> place = ForeignKey(Place, unique=True)
>
>
> Currently, if you have a place reference and want to get to the (0 or
> 1) restaurant, you do something li
Consider:
class Place(Model):
...
class Retaurant(Model):
place = ForeignKey(Place, unique=True)
Currently, if you have a place reference and want to get to the (0 or
1) restaurant, you do something like this:
r = place.restaurant_set.get()
Slightly more idiomatic w/ relat