[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have searched through the dev list and couldn't find anything
> relating to the specific thing I am trying to do. I also am aware that
> both QuerySet and OneToOne fields are in some sort of flux right now.
>
> QuerySet is being completely refactored, and I will of co
On 06/09/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Can anyone come up a reason that OneToOne fields should not be
> optionally automatically followed? Anyone for this support?
>
If one of the reasons for storing data separately is "update and select
patterns", wouldn't it make sense n
I have searched through the dev list and couldn't find anything
relating to the specific thing I am trying to do. I also am aware that
both QuerySet and OneToOne fields are in some sort of flux right now.
QuerySet is being completely refactored, and I will of course wait for
that (like my admin c
