On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Giuseppe Ciotta wrote:
>> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/12399
>>
>> It's a nasty bug which leads to a 100% cache misses situation on
>> memcached when using long keys timeouts.
>>
>> Do you thin
The second patch [1] fixes the memcached backend.
[1]
http://code.djangoproject.com/attachment/ticket/12399/memcached-timeout-fixes.diff
-- Gert
Mobile: +32 498725202
Web: http://gert.selentic.net
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 08:28, Kristian Klette wrote:
> > It's a nasty bug which leads to a 100%
> It's a nasty bug which leads to a 100% cache misses situation on
> memcached when using long keys timeouts.
Wouldn't it be better to fix this in the memcache backend itself? It does
cause a backward compatibility problem for users that do takes this memcached
behaviour into account in their code
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Giuseppe Ciotta wrote:
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/12399
>
> It's a nasty bug which leads to a 100% cache misses situation on
> memcached when using long keys timeouts.
>
> Do you think we can have this included in 1.2? Should i mark it with
> Version:1
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/12399
It's a nasty bug which leads to a 100% cache misses situation on
memcached when using long keys timeouts.
Do you think we can have this included in 1.2? Should i mark it with
Version:1.2 or something? The patch itself is trivial.
--
You received this m
