On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Joshua Russo wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Joshua Russo wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Forest Bond > > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 07:42:24PM -0100, Joshua Russo wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Forest B
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Forest Bond wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 07:42:24PM -0100, Joshua Russo wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Forest Bond >
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 03:28:03PM -0100, Joshua Russo wrote:
> > > On Thu, Au
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Joshua Russo wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Forest Bond
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 07:42:24PM -0100, Joshua Russo wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Forest Bond <
>> for...@alittletooquiet.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > H
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 07:42:24PM -0100, Joshua Russo wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Forest Bond
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 03:28:03PM -0100, Joshua Russo wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Joshua Russo
> wrote:
> > Ok, so I found
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Forest Bond wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 03:28:03PM -0100, Joshua Russo wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Joshua Russo
> wrote:
> > Ok, so I found that the way I was 'casting' the response object didn't
> work. Is
> > there no way to cast an
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 03:28:03PM -0100, Joshua Russo wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Joshua Russo wrote:
> Ok, so I found that the way I was 'casting' the response object didn't work.
> Is
> there no way to cast an instance of a base class to a child class in Python?
>
> What
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Joshua Russo wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Joshua Russo wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Russell Keith-Magee <
>> freakboy3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Joshua Russo
>>> wrote:
>>> > I figured someone ha
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Joshua Russo wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Russell Keith-Magee <
> freakboy3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Joshua Russo
>> wrote:
>> > I figured someone had done this at some time.
>> > What's the general consensus on wh
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Russell Keith-Magee <
freakboy3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Joshua Russo
> wrote:
> > I figured someone had done this at some time.
> > What's the general consensus on when some thing like this should
> > be considered to be added to
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Joshua Russo wrote:
> I figured someone had done this at some time.
> What's the general consensus on when some thing like this should
> be considered to be added to the project and when it should just stay as an
> outside utility?
It's certainly worth putting up
I figured someone had done this at some time.
What's the general consensus on when some thing like this should
be considered to be added to the project and when it should just stay as an
outside utility?
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Thomas Guettler wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> some time ago I wrote
Hi,
some time ago I wrote a snippet which does this:
http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/467/
{{{
If you want to test a post request to a form, you need to give all input
fields, even if you just want to test if one
value gets changed.
This snippets parses the HTML of a view and gives you
On Aug 25, 6:09 pm, Joshua Russo wrote:
> I've just put together an enhancement of the test Client used in unit
> testing. I added the parsing of the content to extract the form fields with
> their initial values as a dictionary, so you can just change a few values
> and throw it back at the serv
I've just put together an enhancement of the test Client used in unit
testing. I added the parsing of the content to extract the form fields with
their initial values as a dictionary, so you can just change a few values
and throw it back at the server.
http://dpaste.com/hold/85281/
I had to do a s
14 matches
Mail list logo
