Re: Extent of async integration into 3.0

2020-01-08 Thread Jure Erznožnik
I am sorry, it seems I misunderstood that "reply to list" (quick way of entering the "to" field) with subject change would create a new thread. I'm not really used to mailing lists. LP, Jure On 08/01/2020 10:31, Javier Buzzi wrote: What does this have to do with what Johan Schiff asked about

Re: Extent of async integration into 3.0

2020-01-08 Thread Javier Buzzi
What does this have to do with what Johan Schiff asked about "customizable urlize"? On Tuesday, January 7, 2020 at 1:55:00 PM UTC+1, Jure Erznožnik wrote: > > I've been monitoring this list for a bit, enough to see that 3.x is now > moving in the async direction. > > Is there a roadmap as to wh

Re: Extent of async integration into 3.0

2020-01-07 Thread Adam Johnson
Hi Jure Andrew laid out the general plan in DEP 0009: https://github.com/django/deps/blob/master/accepted/0009-async.rst I think this answers all your questions, for example: WebSocket support will not be in Django itself; instead, we will make sure > that Channels has all the hooks it needs to

Extent of async integration into 3.0

2020-01-07 Thread Jure Erznožnik
I've been monitoring this list for a bit, enough to see that 3.x is now moving in the async direction. Is there a roadmap as to where we want to get with this direction? Or, to ask more directly: I have been looking into django-channels for a while in order to start catering for ever-increas