On 10/9/07, Marty Alchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll admit, I'm not a big fan of anything that could be gained by
> passing the request to the resolver.
I forgot! After [4237] went in, people can specify a custom resolver
based on the request anyway. So once resolvers are a little more
gene
On 10/9/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can cheat a little bit here because I've thought about this a lot in
> the past. So this is slightly more than just a shot from the hip,
> despite the quick response time. This is all very hypothetical, because
> I've only ever done tho
Hey Marty,
I can cheat a little bit here because I've thought about this a lot in
the past. So this is slightly more than just a shot from the hip,
despite the quick response time. This is all very hypothetical, because
I've only ever done thought experiments here.
You'll want to get feedback fr
Apologies in advance: This is a long email, and I may tend to ramble.
Try to bear with me, please.
In testing out a framework for creating Netvibes widgets (just to see
if I could), I had what I thought to be a great idea for resolving
URLs to methods on a Widget instance. Essentially, each view
