I think this is a non-issue. I worked on GPL'ed project with Dojo before
Dojo became dual licensed and got a response from Alex Russell that it is
possible despite FSF opinion. Additionally I got an explanation regarding
BSD projects:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.dojo.user/1976/matc
On 12/28/05, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thoughts? Am I just being paranoid? :-)
Hey - you're not being paranoid if they're _actually_ out to get you :-)
Seriously: As far as I can see, yes, you're being paranoid (caveat:
IANAL either)
>From http://dojotoolkit.org/community/licens
On 12/28/05, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IANAL, but it is my understanding that one can
> only relicense code if the new license's terms are a superset of the
> old license's terms.
IANAL either, but my understanding, after reading AFL and BSD and GPL
is that AFL is basically BSD with
Since the idea of incorporating Dojo as Django's AJAX toolkit was
brought up, I've been researching the toolkit; I must admit that I'm
bothered by statements from the project regarding its licensing on the
Dojo-interest mailing list -- specifically, claims by the project
about the Academic Free Li
