Re: Documentation of backwards incompatible changes

2009-11-14 Thread Luke Plant
On Saturday 14 November 2009 04:15:26 Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > We can add a stub set of 1.2-final release notes right now, with a > big header that reads "1.2 currently in development". Whenever > someone in the core adds a new feature, we add a section to the > 1.2 release docs. If that me

Re: Documentation of backwards incompatible changes

2009-11-13 Thread Alex Gaynor
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Luke Plant wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The online docs can easily give the impression that we have perfect >> compatibility with Django 1.0 — the 'Django over time' section on [1] >> has a link to 'Backwar

Re: Documentation of backwards incompatible changes

2009-11-13 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Luke Plant wrote: > Hi all, > > The online docs can easily give the impression that we have perfect > compatibility with Django 1.0 — the 'Django over time' section on [1] > has a link to 'Backwards-incompatible changes' [2], which contains > pre-1.0 changes only,

Documentation of backwards incompatible changes

2009-11-13 Thread Luke Plant
Hi all, The online docs can easily give the impression that we have perfect compatibility with Django 1.0 — the 'Django over time' section on [1] has a link to 'Backwards-incompatible changes' [2], which contains pre-1.0 changes only, and a notice at the top saying you don't need to read it if