On Jan 30, 8:21 am, "Marc Fargas Esteve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Buildbot was written for that, the svn repository can tell the
> buildbot when a new checking has been done and start a new bunch of
> jobs against it. Having this in place the part of taking patches from
> trac is not so hard,
On 1/31/07, Marc Fargas Esteve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> inline
>
> On 1/31/07, Matthew Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Django buildbot slave is currently running inside a Solaris 10
> > zone so it is virtualized...kind of.
> >
> > Let me clarify that testing python 2.3 and
Hi,
inline
On 1/31/07, Matthew Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Django buildbot slave is currently running inside a Solaris 10
> zone so it is virtualized...kind of.
>
> Let me clarify that testing python 2.3 and 2.4 would require a
> separate buildbot master than pybots unless you can t
On 31/01/07, Marc Fargas Esteve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Matthew
>
> On 1/30/07, Matthew Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I run the django pybot. It wouldn't be difficult to add other backends
> > to the tests and is something I've been considering for a while. As
> > for python ve
On 31/01/07, Marc Fargas Esteve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 1/30/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Marc Fargas Esteve:
> > That sounds interesting. (Did I mention that it should run python
> > versions 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5? ;-)
>
> As Matthew said this could be done with separat
[note: maybe this message appears twice as I sent it with the wrong
reply-to and google-groups likes to reject it, if so, sorry ;) ]
Hi Matthew
On 1/30/07, Matthew Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I run the django pybot. It wouldn't be difficult to add other backends
> to the tests and is s
Hi Matthew
On 1/30/07, Matthew Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I run the django pybot. It wouldn't be difficult to add other backends
> to the tests and is something I've been considering for a while. As
> for python versions, pybot only tests 2.5 and trunk
> . Testing against 2.3 and 2.4 w
On 1/30/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marc Fargas Esteve:
> That sounds interesting. (Did I mention that it should run python
> versions 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5? ;-)
As Matthew said this could be done with separate buildbots or slaves
running different jobs.
> I wouldn't mind doing t
Marc Fargas Esteve:
> On 1/30/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [..]
>> I'm now dreaming of a test service that would automatically run the
>> testsuite for a given patch (or multiple patches) with all supported
>> database backends ...
>
> Also thought about that, getting up a bui
On 30/01/07, Marc Fargas Esteve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> inline
>
> On 1/30/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [..]
> > I'm now dreaming of a test service that would automatically run the
> > testsuite for a given patch (or multiple patches) with all supported
> > databas
Hi,
inline
On 1/30/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
> I'm now dreaming of a test service that would automatically run the
> testsuite for a given patch (or multiple patches) with all supported
> database backends ...
Also thought about that, getting up a buildbot for testing t
11 matches
Mail list logo
