Re: Discussion on #5610 - addition to dumpdata to specify model

2007-09-27 Thread David Reynolds
On 27 Sep 2007, at 11:52 am, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > That sounds like the best approach to me, and would be consistent with > the testing API. As for multiple models; I would suggest: > > ./manage.py dumpdata product.Category product.Vendor product.Order > > Again, this would keep everythin

Re: Discussion on #5610 - addition to dumpdata to specify model

2007-09-27 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 9/27/07, David Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 27 Sep 2007, at 1:07 am, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > > Sounds like a good idea to me. It would dovetail nicely with the > > proposal from ticket #4656. > > > > Want to try your hand at a patch? > > Sure, do you think the way I sugge

Re: Discussion on #5610 - addition to dumpdata to specify model

2007-09-27 Thread David Reynolds
On 27 Sep 2007, at 1:07 am, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > Sounds like a good idea to me. It would dovetail nicely with the > proposal from ticket #4656. > > Want to try your hand at a patch? Sure, do you think the way I suggested it working would be right? ie: ./manage.py dumpdata product.Cate

Re: Discussion on #5610 - addition to dumpdata to specify model

2007-09-26 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On 9/27/07, David Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: \> > Would anyone else find this useful? > > > > I'm quite happy to take a shot at it, if anyone else will find it of > > any use. > > Just to clarify: > > http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5610 Sounds like a good idea to me. It would dove

Re: Discussion on #5610 - addition to dumpdata to specify model

2007-09-26 Thread David Reynolds
On 26 Sep 2007, at 4:07 pm, David Reynolds wrote: > > Hi, > > Would anyone else find this useful? > > I'm quite happy to take a shot at it, if anyone else will find it of > any use. Just to clarify: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5610 Anyone any thoughts? Thanks, David -- David Reyno