On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Bob Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would volunteer to work on this (I voted +1), though I guess you
> need a committer to back it up.
As long as someone's willing to review it -- which I don't think will
be hard -- having someone volunteering to do the cod
>
> - the SafeForm feature (eight +0). Personally, I suspect we
> should stop trying to second-guess form features for a bit, but
> if somebody came up with the perfect code, there's no real
> reason to defer that one (it got 8 +0 votes and nothing else, so
>
On Nov 20, 11:28 pm, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi folks --
>
> I've posted a draft of the 1.1 roadmap, incorporating the feedback
> gathered here over the last
> week:http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Version1.1Roadmap
>
> Discuss.
>
> Jacob
Hi Jacob,
I'm wondering wha
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, so I'm going to add the "lots of +0" stuff to the draft, and the
> note about ORM aggregation,
that should have read "ORM identity map".
OK, draft updated; hopefully it's a bit more sane now.
Also, one othe
Hey Malcolm --
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not so sure the final phases of that process worked out smoothly. I
> thought there'd be a brief round, at least within the maintainers group
> (and maybe this thread is it) where we reconcile the
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 17:28 -0600, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Hi folks --
>
> I've posted a draft of the 1.1 roadmap, incorporating the feedback
> gathered here over the last week:
> http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Version1.1Roadmap
>
> Discuss.
I'm not so sure the final phases of that proc
Hi folks --
I've posted a draft of the 1.1 roadmap, incorporating the feedback
gathered here over the last week:
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Version1.1Roadmap
Discuss.
Jacob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
