The --with-handler idea for manage.py runserver sounds reasonable to
me.
I just wanted to clarify a couple of points.
> No, this isn't correct. You already have to specify which handler to
> run. You still have to do that exactly once in each case.
I meant that it requires one extra configurati
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 15:15 -0700, Jesse Young wrote:
> > No it's not. Since there's no common way to customize, sub-classing is
> > the perfect way to do it, since people can then do whatever they want.
> > How is asking somebody to write a subclass in Python a high barrier to
> > entry? We're a
> No it's not. Since there's no common way to customize, sub-classing is
> the perfect way to do it, since people can then do whatever they want.
> How is asking somebody to write a subclass in Python a high barrier to
> entry? We're assuming knowledge of the language, but that's all.
Well, I'm n
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 18:59 -0700, Jesse Young wrote:
> Hi Malcolm,
>
> Thanks for explaining the rationale behind this. It'd certainly be
> possible to do what we want by overriding handle_uncaught_exception in
> a ModPythonHandler subclass.
>
> This method has a higher barrier to entry than I
On Oct 15, 10:18 pm, Jesse Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is your suggestion that, since mail_admins happens to be the only
> place in Django that uses settings.ADMINS, I could do something like:
>
> class AdminsObject(list):
> def __iter__(self):
> // do some custom notification
>
Jesse Young wrote:
> The built-in behavior for
> django.core.handlers.base.handle_uncaught_exception calls mail_admins
> for each internal server error.
>
> So if a very high-traffic view has an internal server error, duplicate
> emails will be sent at a very high rate. This isn't usually
> desir
Is your suggestion that, since mail_admins happens to be the only
place in Django that uses settings.ADMINS, I could do something like:
class AdminsObject(list):
def __iter__(self):
// do some custom notification
// manually write the friendly 500 error page to the output
stream some
Did you try subclassing list (& overriding __iter__) for the ADMINS
object?
-rob
On Oct 15, 1:58 pm, Jesse Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The built-in behavior for
> django.core.handlers.base.handle_uncaught_exception calls mail_admins
> for each internal server error.
>
> So if a very high
Hi Malcolm,
Thanks for explaining the rationale behind this. It'd certainly be
possible to do what we want by overriding handle_uncaught_exception in
a ModPythonHandler subclass.
This method has a higher barrier to entry than I'd like, though. For
one, this kind of customization requires updatin
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 13:58 -0700, Jesse Young wrote:
> The built-in behavior for
> django.core.handlers.base.handle_uncaught_exception calls mail_admins
> for each internal server error.
>
> So if a very high-traffic view has an internal server error, duplicate
> emails will be sent at a very h
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Jesse Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I see there is a got_request_exception signal already... so one could
> effectively do the same thing by adding a signal handler and making
> settings.ADMINS the empty list so that mail_admins effectively becomes
> a no-op
I see there is a got_request_exception signal already... so one could
effectively do the same thing by adding a signal handler and making
settings.ADMINS the empty list so that mail_admins effectively becomes
a no-op.
Even so, it looks like mail_admins will open a SMTP connection to send
an email
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Jesse Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> I was thinking it would be useful to add a setting like
> EXCEPTION_NOTIFIER = 'path.to.custom.notifier' , where the default
> would look something like this:
>
> def mail_exception_to_admins(request, exc_info):
>
The built-in behavior for
django.core.handlers.base.handle_uncaught_exception calls mail_admins
for each internal server error.
So if a very high-traffic view has an internal server error, duplicate
emails will be sent at a very high rate. This isn't usually
desirable...
We worked around this by
14 matches
Mail list logo
