gt;> > Might it be simpler for each of us to simply fill out the individual
>> > form? Or does that not cover the proper basis of members be able to
>> > work on django on paid company time?
>>
>> I'm not sure that the employee/member distinction tha
Or does that not cover the proper basis of members be able to
> > work on django on paid company time?
>
> I'm not sure that the employee/member distinction that you're making
> here is significant from the point of view of the CLA. We need a
> corporate CLA to cover t
member distinction that you're making
here is significant from the point of view of the CLA. We need a
corporate CLA to cover those jurisdictions where companies implicitly
or contractually own the work of anyone working for them. Whether
those people are called "members" or "em
I am interested in getting the SlashRoot membership all filed with CLA's.
However, people who work on django at SlashRoot aren't "employees" -
they're members. Can we simply change the language of the CLA or are
the legal wranglings more complex than that?
Might it be simpler for each of us to s
