Re: Convince us to continue using setuptools

2006-08-03 Thread Istvan Albert
Never really understood why you needed this in the first place. The automatic setuptools installation has caused me some grief as it installs an obsolete version ... I forgot the exact specifics but it took me quite a while to track down that installing django was causing all kinds of strange prob

Re: Convince us to continue using setuptools

2006-08-03 Thread Michael Twomey
reason to use setuptools :) Projects like matplotlib got mired in so many installation issues trying to get all their shared data installed correctly on so many configurations that they switched to setuptools (well, that was one of the main reasons I think). > So, convince us to continue using

Re: Convince us to continue using setuptools

2006-08-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This is wandering very far from "should we use setuptools". You are > talking about a large redesign of the model system towards infinite > flexibility. That's probably a topic for another thread. It's not really > tied to setuptools usage beyond you think it would make it easier to > leverage t

Re: Convince us to continue using setuptools

2006-08-02 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 01:02 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Why does this require setuptools, though? I mean, the Python XML > > utilities used entry points for extra loaders (e.g. 4Suite) for years > > before setuptools came along. > > "Before" is the key word there, I think. Now that setupt

Re: Convince us to continue using setuptools

2006-08-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Why does this require setuptools, though? I mean, the Python XML > utilities used entry points for extra loaders (e.g. 4Suite) for years > before setuptools came along. "Before" is the key word there, I think. Now that setuptools is a defacto standard, I think it would be an odd decision to rew

Re: Convince us to continue using setuptools

2006-08-02 Thread Deryck Hodge
On 8/2/06, Jay Parlar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "python setup.py install" has been the defacto standard for years and > years, it's a distutils feature. > You're right. Not really sure what I was thinking there. Must be the stupidity of a too hurriedly written email. :-) (Stupidity for conf

Re: Convince us to continue using setuptools

2006-08-02 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 17:23 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > So, convince us to continue using setuptools. What incentive do we > > have to keep using it? I'm not sure the convenience of easily being > > able to specify a manifest outweighs the horrid stain of re

Re: Convince us to continue using setuptools

2006-08-02 Thread Jay Parlar
On 8/2/06, Deryck Hodge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Adrian Holovaty wrote: > > > > > > So, convince us to continue using setuptools. What incentive do we > > The easy packaging is a big plus, and I think, too, that "python > setup.py inst

Re: Convince us to continue using setuptools

2006-08-02 Thread Deryck Hodge
> Adrian Holovaty wrote: > > > > So, convince us to continue using setuptools. What incentive do we The easy packaging is a big plus, and I think, too, that "python setup.py install" is becoming somewhat of the defacto python installation standard. If it's just the

Re: Convince us to continue using setuptools

2006-08-02 Thread Eugene Lazutkin
Adrian Holovaty wrote: > > So, convince us to continue using setuptools. What incentive do we Which reminds me that you used setuptools 0.6c1, which is a developer's version, if I am not mistaken. setuptools tries to update itself from the current version on my computer and cannot

Re: Convince us to continue using setuptools

2006-08-02 Thread Jay Parlar
On 8/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here are a couple that I've been thinking about, both using setuptools > entry points. Hmm... I forgot about that. Jason's right, entry points do rule. At least from what I've seen of them in nose.py :) If there is an effort to move to e

Re: Convince us to continue using setuptools

2006-08-02 Thread Eugene Lazutkin
Adrian Holovaty wrote: > > So, convince us to continue using setuptools. What incentive do we > have to keep using it? I'm not sure the convenience of easily being > able to specify a manifest outweighs the horrid stain of requiring an > Internet connection just to insta

Re: Convince us to continue using setuptools

2006-08-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> So, convince us to continue using setuptools. What incentive do we > have to keep using it? I'm not sure the convenience of easily being > able to specify a manifest outweighs the horrid stain of requiring an > Internet connection just to install our software. Are there any ot

Re: Convince us to continue using setuptools

2006-08-02 Thread dummy
Hi all, I wondered what essential function of setuptools is used and I think that only find_packages() is neccessary. Try the following patch for setup.py and a MANIFEST.in If this works for you, than I won't suggest setuptools bundled with Django. I tested the following usecases: python setu

Re: Convince us to continue using setuptools

2006-08-02 Thread Michael Radziej
Adrian Holovaty wrote: > I really want to be convinced to continue using setuptools, but I'm > drawing a blank... Insights are appreciated! How about bundling setuptools so that you don't need to download it later? Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this

Re: Convince us to continue using setuptools

2006-08-02 Thread Jay Parlar
I'm in general a big fan of setuptools. However, I don't really see a need for it in Django. I say dump it. Jay P. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, s

Convince us to continue using setuptools

2006-08-02 Thread Adrian Holovaty
e advanced than the standard Python distutils). This is because we figured it'd be too much of a pain to create a MANIFEST file and keep it updated. Yes, this is a *horrible* reason to use setuptools rather than distutils. So, convince us to continue using setuptools. What incentive do we have to kee