On 15 Nov 2007, at 4:24 pm, Ryan K wrote:
>
> I've just implemented the django.contrib.comments system for my site
> which is actually a great package that doesn't seem to be used by many
> people. Does anyone have any plans to update the system? Some basic
> configuration stuff seems to be miss
I've just implemented the django.contrib.comments system for my site
which is actually a great package that doesn't seem to be used by many
people. Does anyone have any plans to update the system? Some basic
configuration stuff seems to be missing like the ability to configure
where the comment's
I've just implemented the django.contrib.comments system for my site
which is actually a great package that doesn't seem to be used by many
people. Does anyone have any plans to update the system? Some basic
configuration stuff seems to be missing like the ability to configure
where the comment's
+1
I like the simplicity and flexibility this approach provides. One
question - if the "Comment" is generalized to become a vehicle for any
user-supplied attribute (text comment, tag/label, star rating, etc.) to
an arbitrary contenttype, I can see having several "Comment"
(sub)classes that can d
James Bennett wrote:
> My personal preference would be to specify an interface that comments
> have to implement, and then let the actual model be whatever the
> developer wants; maybe a subclass of django.contib.models.Comment,
> maybe not. That feels like it'd give the maximum flexibility, and a
On 10/26/06, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It might also be possible to achieve the same with model inheritance
> because the way we have decided to expose that is via an attribute on
> the base model. So if MyComment was a subclass of Comment, a Comment
> instance would have a m
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 11:29 -0700, Rob Hudson wrote:
> James Bennett wrote:
> > On 10/26/06, Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Are there goals or docs about what this might become? There seem to be
> >> enough people using the comments systems that maybe people could work
> >> on a patch
James Bennett wrote:
> On 10/26/06, Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Are there goals or docs about what this might become? There seem to be
>> enough people using the comments systems that maybe people could work
>> on a patch (or at least get started in the right direction) if there
>> w
On 10/26/06, Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there goals or docs about what this might become? There seem to be
> enough people using the comments systems that maybe people could work
> on a patch (or at least get started in the right direction) if there
> were some goals and ideas on
The Wiki page on the API Stability says this about the comment system:
> The comments framework, which is yet undocumented, will likely get a complete
> rewrite
> before Django 1.0. Even if the change isn't quite that drastic, there will at
> least be
> moderate changes.
Are there goals or doc
10 matches
Mail list logo
