On 8/14/07, George Vilches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> George Vilches wrote:
> Unfortunately, since there's only a syncdb signal, I can't even do
> things like a reset on it, and there's definitely no way currently to
> get the SQL generated from my syncdb signal. Being able to get the
> CREAT
Marty Alchin wrote:
> Okay, I'll post one last time on this subject, then leave you guys to
> do what you're supposed to be doing. I'm only posting here in case who
> heard me ranting find it interesting. I did manage to come up with a
> solution like I mentioned, and I'll be posting it soon. It'd
Okay, I'll post one last time on this subject, then leave you guys to
do what you're supposed to be doing. I'm only posting here in case who
heard me ranting find it interesting. I did manage to come up with a
solution like I mentioned, and I'll be posting it soon. It'd be up
already, but it seems
On 8/14/07, George Vilches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thoughts?
Absolutely! Though I think this thread would get too far off-topic if
I rattle them all off right now. I'll do a little work on the subject
and see what I can come up with. Your approach looks very close to
what I was thinking, but
Marty Alchin wrote:
> This sounds like a far more complicated example than I had considered
> when I was doing my work with dynamic models[1], but I did have
> success getting syncdb to install dynamic models, provided a few
> things are in order. I probably didn't document them well enough on
> t
This sounds like a far more complicated example than I had considered
when I was doing my work with dynamic models[1], but I did have
success getting syncdb to install dynamic models, provided a few
things are in order. I probably didn't document them well enough on
the wiki, but I could do so if
George Vilches wrote:
> Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> On 8/12/07, George Vilches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 1) Add a signal to every option?
>> If we were going to go down this path, this would be the preferred
>> option. However, I'm not sure I'm convinced of the need. Which
>> commands exact
Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On 8/12/07, George Vilches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 1) Add a signal to every option?
>
> If we were going to go down this path, this would be the preferred
> option. However, I'm not sure I'm convinced of the need. Which
> commands exactly do you think require si
On 8/12/07, George Vilches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1) Add a signal to every option?
If we were going to go down this path, this would be the preferred
option. However, I'm not sure I'm convinced of the need. Which
commands exactly do you think require signals?
Yours,
Russ Magee %-)
--~--
I'm splitting this conversation off from the other conversation on SQL
logging, because I think that topic has merits all its own, and this one
has more to discuss and slightly more possibility for
backwards-incompatibility. I don't want to pork barrel this issue in
with a perfectly legitimat
10 matches
Mail list logo
