On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Schmilblick wrote:
> Sorry for crashing the list, but how does this affect this bug:
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5390 ?
>
> I'm currently using django with the patch provided in that ticket, and
> the latest commits regarding the gsoc-project created a
Sorry for crashing the list, but how does this affect this bug:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5390 ?
I'm currently using django with the patch provided in that ticket, and
the latest commits regarding the gsoc-project created a diff im not
sure how to handle.
Let me know if you need any mo
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>
> Hi Russ --
>
> I'm +1 on merging the patch immediately. I have some feedback on the
> couple of issues you raised below, but I see no reason they can't be
> addressed after merging.
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Russell Keith-Ma
Hi Russ --
I'm +1 on merging the patch immediately. I have some feedback on the
couple of issues you raised below, but I see no reason they can't be
addressed after merging.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> The automatically generated m2m model is the equivalent of
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Johannes Dollinger
> wrote:
>>
>> The m2m-refactor patch breaks ManyToManyFields on abstract models:
>> "AssertionError: ForeignKey cannot define a relation with abstract
>> class A"
>
> Thanks for the
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Johannes Dollinger
wrote:
>
> The m2m-refactor patch breaks ManyToManyFields on abstract models:
> "AssertionError: ForeignKey cannot define a relation with abstract
> class A"
Thanks for the report, Johannes. I'll take a look at this and see what
I can do about
The m2m-refactor patch breaks ManyToManyFields on abstract models:
"AssertionError: ForeignKey cannot define a relation with abstract
class A"
{{{
class R(models.Model): pass
class A(models.Model):
r_set = models.ManyToManyField(R, related_name="%(class)s_set")
class Meta:
On Oct 30, 4:33 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just finished the polishing the first part of Alex's GSoC work to
> add Multi-db, which I'd like to commit. This is a call for feedback.
I forgot to mention - the patch _should_ be completely backwards
compatible, and require no
Hi all,
I've just finished the polishing the first part of Alex's GSoC work to
add Multi-db, which I'd like to commit. This is a call for feedback.
This first patch isn't directly related to multi-db, but it is a
prerequisite that will allow the multi-db code to function. The goal
of this patch
