their implementation (
>> https://github.com/disqus/django-bitfield ), but it supports neither
>> Python 3 nor 1.7. I hope this field could get official supports.
>>
>> Syntax draft:
>> https://github.com/chicheng/deps/blob/bitmaskfield/drafts/BitMaskField.md
>>
&g
m/disqus/django-bitfield ), but it supports neither
> Python 3 nor 1.7. I hope this field could get official supports.
>
> Syntax draft:
> https://github.com/chicheng/deps/blob/bitmaskfield/drafts/BitMaskField.md
>
> Chi
>
>
> --
> You received this message because yo
:
https://github.com/chicheng/deps/blob/bitmaskfield/drafts/BitMaskField.md
Chi
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to django-developer
EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew: Thanks, that looks awesome.
>
> The whole BitMaskField(choices=LIST) idea scares me. You must then force
> extra knowledge on the user that ordering is important. If programmer Y
> decides the list of choices looks better in alphabetical order (or d
Andrew: Thanks, that looks awesome.
The whole BitMaskField(choices=LIST) idea scares me. You must then force
extra knowledge on the user that ordering is important. If programmer Y
decides the list of choices looks better in alphabetical order (or decides
to add a choice in the middle of the
Awesome to see some people working on this. I had tried pre-queryset
refactor and It was just not doable witht he fields API. Can't wait to
see the final result of this :)
I'm also agreeing with the API of field = BitMaskField(choices=LIST)
On Dec 6, 10:37 am, Carl Meyer <[EM
@Andrew: Thanks! That's precisely the missing piece from my code; if
I get some time to put it all together, I think it'll be a full
solution. My approach uses sets of arbitrary flag values rather than
creating constants for flags, and it's implemented as a normal model
field, which seems a litt
ute
names with creating constants somewhere for that attribute's bitmask?
So that you could somehow, approximately go BitCheck('flags', IS_FOO)
Anyways, hope this all helps.
Andrew
On Dec 4, 2:16 pm, "Craig Kimerer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apologies if this h
y external to Django. The one
> thing I would suggest is not to require the user to define the value
> for each option, handle that internally. Have some sort of class to
> encapsulate the public portion of that.
>
> Alex
>
> On Dec 5, 10:53 am, "Mike Axiak" <
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I seem to be missing something. Why is it that you cannot just write a
> BitMaskField yourself outside of Django?
>
> I thought that it might have been that we don't have __any and __all lookup
> types, but it seems you can override get_db_pre
I've written and am using a BitFlagsField, but hadn't yet shared it
since I haven't been able to get the ORM lookup stuff working the way
I want it. I've pasted my code-in-progress at dpaste:
http://dpaste.com/hold/96435/
The current code includes a model BitFlagsField, a form
MultiCheckboxFiel
I seem to be missing something. Why is it that you cannot just write a
BitMaskField yourself outside of Django?
I thought that it might have been that we don't have __any and __all lookup
types, but it seems you can override get_db_prep_lookup in a field, so
that's not an issue.
And i
On Dec 4, 5:16 pm, "Craig Kimerer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Apologies if this has been asked already and I have missed it in
>> searching,
>> but is there any interest in taking a patch for a BitmaskField?
>>
>> Given the following (albeit stupid) exampl
aig Kimerer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apologies if this has been asked already and I have missed it in searching,
> but is there any interest in taking a patch for a BitmaskField?
>
> Given the following (albeit stupid) example to show some usages that would
> be nice to
Apologies if this has been asked already and I have missed it in searching,
but is there any interest in taking a patch for a BitmaskField?
Given the following (albeit stupid) example to show some usages that would
be nice to have on a bitmask field. I should note in the examples below,
the
15 matches
Mail list logo
