On 08/09/05, mrelectron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> totally plus 1 with all of this, i would be more than happy to do the
> documention. the simple conventions and guidance which RoR gives for
> application and project architecture has helped a great deal in getting
> it accepted.
Cool. The exi
hiya
totally plus 1 with all of this, i would be more than happy to do the
documention. the simple conventions and guidance which RoR gives for
application and project architecture has helped a great deal in getting
it accepted.
thanks
mark
> On 04/09/05, Eugene Lazutkin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 1) Currently app's name should be unique within a project. I want to be
> > able
> > to reuse the same app several times. Example: categories. I may have
> > different categories for my blog, for my bookmarks, and for my articles.
Kieran,
Thank you for your comments.
Regarding #1 --- could you explain your idea a little bit?
Regarding #6 --- thank you, somehow I missed block.super in documentation.
It would help me in most cases.
Thanks,
Eugene
"Kieran Holland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTEC
Thanks for your ideas,
I hope that others - especially those with Ruby experience - may be
able to offer some informed solutions. In the case of points (1) and
(6) I wonder if the following would help:
On 04/09/05, Eugene Lazutkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Currently app's name should be
Thank you for detailed post. You are raising valid points. I want to add my
laundry list, which partially intersects with yours.
1) Currently app's name should be unique within a project. I want to be able
to reuse the same app several times. Example: categories. I may have
different categorie
Hi there,
Django rocks. Or should I say it swings? (Probably a tiresome quip
already - sorry!). Thanks to all the developers for your excellent
work, not only in creating a fine web development framework, but also
in establishing the beginnings of a great community to support it.
In playing a
