On 27 Mag, 22:58, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> FWIW Jacob was wrong, there is another tiket, but I can't find out now
> (yay trac search ;)), so don't be offended if I close your ticket.
Alex, no offense at all :-)
Ah, you don't be offended but I already closed it as a dupe of 8408
(thanks to Jeremy).
Found via google site:...
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/8408
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Marcob wrote:
>> On May 27, 11:13 pm, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>>
>>> I thought there was already a ticket open for this, but I can't seem
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Marcob wrote:
> On May 27, 11:13 pm, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>
>> I thought there was already a ticket open for this, but I can't seem
>> to find one. Can you open a ticket so that we don't forget?
>
> To posterity: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13643
>
>
On May 27, 11:13 pm, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> I thought there was already a ticket open for this, but I can't seem
> to find one. Can you open a ticket so that we don't forget?
To posterity: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13643
:-)
Ciao.
Marco.
--
You received this message because yo
On 27 Mag, 23:13, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> I thought there was already a ticket open for this, but I can't seem
> to find one. Can you open a ticket so that we don't forget?
Sure. Meanwhile I solved my problem with LazyPaginator and a bit of
monkey patching.
I'll post my ugly code within the
rOn Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Marcob wrote:
> I've a table with only 160.000 records (but a record has many fields)
> and opening its admin page takes 55 seconds. A select count(*) takes
> 50 seconds, so I know it's all a db problem.
Yeah, this is a known problem -- there really needs to be
With postgresql count(*) is a slow operation because it forces a full
table scan:
http://groups.google.it/group/pgsql.performance/browse_thread/thread/6f94b296019a0e1e/d2d6ca3018f51cb3?hl=it&ie=UTF-8&q=postgresql+django+slow+count%28*%29#d2d6ca3018f51cb3
I've a table with only 160.000 records (but