On 22 sep, 03:21, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, msaelices wrote:
>
> > You don't see well the code.
>
> Oh, you're right!
>
> I better stop triaging and go to bed now ;-)
Good night. I do the same (It's 3:26AM) :-(
>
> To quote Malcolm: Sorry for the unconvenience
On Fri, Sep 21, msaelices wrote:
>
> You don't see well the code.
Oh, you're right!
I better stop triaging and go to bed now ;-)
To quote Malcolm: Sorry for the unconvenience ;-)
Michael
--
noris network AG - Deutschherrnstraße 15-19 - D-90429 Nürnberg -
Tel +49-911-9352-0 - Fax +49-911-93
You don't see well the code. The code does caching of
django_contenttype table like the other file. It reduces by caching
this SQL sentence:
obj1.related_object
select * from django_content_types where id = 4 ---> a content type
for one relationship
select * from myapp_mytable where id = 27 --->
On Fri, Sep 21, msaelices wrote:
>
> I have uploaded a patch for improve generic relations performance:
>
>http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5570
>
> But mir closed my ticket because it think patch is not convenient.
>
> I think there are a lot of files with same type of caching. I don
I have uploaded a patch for improve generic relations performance:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5570
But mir closed my ticket because it think patch is not convenient.
I think there are a lot of files with same type of caching. I don't
use django cache framework. I use a simple dicti
