On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To generate the files just cd django; django-admin.py compilemessages -
> l LANG_CODE
>
> Another language ticket is: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9597
>
OK, thanks, I applied the two translation updates t
To generate the files just cd django; django-admin.py compilemessages -
l LANG_CODE
Another language ticket is: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9597
On Nov 18, 2:44 pm, "Karen Tracey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 7:46 PM, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
>
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 7:46 PM, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'll defer to James to make the final call, but I'd prefer to do this
> > and release 1.0.2 on Monday or Tuesday with a note that it's ba
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 18:42 -0800, Justin Bronn wrote:
> > This:http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9613seems to be of the
> > same vein. I haven't confirmed it however.
>
> Yeah I confirmed it. I went through the contrib apps one-by-one to
> see if anything else was missing. In addition to
> This:http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9613seems to be of the
> same vein. I haven't confirmed it however.
Yeah I confirmed it. I went through the contrib apps one-by-one to
see if anything else was missing. In addition to auth's missing
files, the templates for formtools are omitted.
I'
This: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9613 seems to be of the
same vein. I haven't confirmed it however.
On Nov 16, 7:54 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 17:42 -0600, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Karen Tracey <[EMAIL
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 17:42 -0600, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Karen Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The other alternative is building 1.0.2 from 'traditionally' from the
> > current 1.0.X branch contents. So 1.0.2 would have a handful of fixes in
> > additi
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll defer to James to make the final call, but I'd prefer to do this
> and release 1.0.2 on Monday or Tuesday with a note that it's basically
> 1.0.1 plus the GeoDjango stuff we forgot and a couple of new bug fixes
>
> I didn't know MANIFEST.in needed data directories listedI know from bug
> fixing in setup.py that it generates a list of data files to pass into setup
> -- I wonder what that is used for? I guess it's for install but not
> distribution tarfile building?
Neither did I -- and those files _ar
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Karen Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The other alternative is building 1.0.2 from 'traditionally' from the
> current 1.0.X branch contents. So 1.0.2 would have a handful of fixes in
> addition to the missing gis files. The fixes that have gone in are small &
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Justin Bronn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, I eventually figured this out on my own -- it was the
> > problem. Fixed in r9473 and r9474.
> >
>
> I wish I had known about MANIFEST.in sooner, is there any way we re-
> tag and re-release 1.0.1 with the miss
> Thanks, I eventually figured this out on my own -- it was the
> problem. Fixed in r9473 and r9474.
>
I wish I had known about MANIFEST.in sooner, is there any way we re-
tag and re-release 1.0.1 with the missing files? Or am I forced to
instruct GeoDjango users to avoid easy_install until 1.0.
> The reason is that MANIFEST.in doesn't tell setuptools to include those
> directories in the distribution.
Thanks, I eventually figured this out on my own -- it was the
problem. Fixed in r9473 and r9474.
-Justin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message b
On Nov 16, 2008, at 15:37, Justin Bronn wrote:
> http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/branches/releases/1.0.X/django/contrib/gis/templates
> http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/branches/releases/1.0.X/django/contrib/gis/tests/geoapp/sql
>
> While the missing test data is OK, not
> (and obviously I meant 'setup.py sdist')
>
I don't know how setup.py bundles a tarball, but it's doing it wrong
-- GeoDjango is broken in the 1.0.1 release tarball. In particular,
at least the following directories were completely _omitted_ from this
release:
http://code.djangoproject.com/bro
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:42 PM, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. When I rolled the release last night, I did 'python manage.py
> sdist' to generate the package, then uploaded it to the
> djangoproject.com server.
(and obviously I meant 'setup.py sdist')
--
"Bureaucrat Conrad, yo
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 7:48 AM, leonel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ive downloaded the tar.gz from
> http://www.djangoproject.com/download/1.0.1/tarball/
>
> and the md5sum does not match the md5sum from:
> http://media.djangoproject.com/pgp/Django-1.0.1-final.checksum.txt
OK, so here's what ha
Tonight we've released Django 1.0.1, a bugfix release in the 1.0
series containing improvements and fixes since the 1.0 release. This
is a recommended upgrade for anyone currently running Django 1.0.
The blog entry announcing the release is here:
http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2008/nov/15/10
18 matches
Mail list logo
