Re: 1.9 Changes to BoundField

2015-10-26 Thread Carlton
Thank you. Spot on answer. C. On Monday, 26 October 2015 15:55:03 UTC+1, Tim Graham wrote: > > The release notes don't mention it because it's a private API until now. > Feel free to do nothing as we're unlikely to remove the backwards > compatibility alias for a while, at least until versions <

Re: 1.9 Changes to BoundField

2015-10-26 Thread Tim Graham
The release notes don't mention it because it's a private API until now. Feel free to do nothing as we're unlikely to remove the backwards compatibility alias for a while, at least until versions < 1.9 are unsupported at which point you could update the import to the new location without needin

1.9 Changes to BoundField

2015-10-26 Thread Carlton
Hi. We've got a PR open on Crispy Forms to accommodate the changes to BoundField's location in 1.9. It changed, broke the imports and was then imported back for compatibility. The release notes say very little here. Could anyone who knows the plan say, whether BoundField should still be imp