On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 22:06 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On 9/11/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This change caught my eye going past.
> >
> > Do you think it's a good idea to have foo.has_key('blah') and "'blah' in
> > foo"
> > behaving differently? Is there som
On 9/11/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This change caught my eye going past.
>
> Do you think it's a good idea to have foo.has_key('blah') and "'blah' in foo"
> behaving differently? Is there some reason we can't go the traditional
> way and just alias it with has_key = __c
Russell,
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 08:36 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: russellm
> Date: 2007-09-11 08:36:09 -0500 (Tue, 11 Sep 2007)
> New Revision: 6097
>
> Modified:
>django/trunk/django/http/__init__.py
> Log:
> Fixed #5318 -- Added __contains__ method to HttpRequest, mirroring ex
