for
>> djangoproject.com.
>>
>> Uri.
>> אורי
>> u...@speedy.net
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 6:21 PM Peter Inglesby
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> An email with an update on ticket that I
t.com in 2020 had
> SPF neutral. Maybe you should update the SPF records for djangoproject.com
> .
>
> Uri.
> אורי
> u...@speedy.net
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 6:21 PM Peter Inglesby
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> An email with an update on t
:
> Hi folks,
>
> An email with an update on ticket that I'm subscribed to has ended up in
> my gmail spam folder:
>
> [image: image.png]
>
> I'm not sure what to suggest!
>
> Peter.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are sub
Hi folks,
An email with an update on ticket that I'm subscribed to has ended up in my
gmail spam folder:
[image: image.png]
I'm not sure what to suggest!
Peter.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions t
e where BitBounce responded, I tried again:
> https://twitter.com/aymericaugustin/status/1097231848973967362
>
> I'm skeptical about their willingness to fight spam: they're using it as
> their primary marketing channel. The more we're talking about them, the
> happie
:35, Aymeric Augustin
> a écrit :
>
> Since Twitter is the only place where BitBounce responded, I tried again:
> https://twitter.com/aymericaugustin/status/1097231848973967362
>
> I'm skeptical about their willingness to fight spam: they're using it as
> their p
I figured I’d email their CEO (stewart.den...@bitbounce.com) and ask if he
can look into this, because it’s kind of ridiculous. I think I should have
known beforehand what kind of automated reply I got…
I’ve also marked them as spam and so don’t receive them anymore but I can
imagine it’s pretty
https://twitter.com/stewart__dennis/status/1081973497025331201?s=21
I’m sure that falsely replying to mailing list emails helps with these
numbers.
I’m just going ahead and marking them as spam, because that’s what they
are. It’s negligence at this point.
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 4:35 am, Aymeric
Since Twitter is the only place where BitBounce responded, I tried again:
https://twitter.com/aymericaugustin/status/1097231848973967362
I'm skeptical about their willingness to fight spam: they're using it as their
primary marketing channel. The more we're talking about them, t
Sorry for resurrecting but this is still very much a problem. Same person,
same autoresponder.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 11:11:38 +0100
Aymeric Augustin wrote:
> I was pessimistic; it seems that a BitBounce employee might read this
> message.
>
Last week, Adam twitted at BitBounce about this, and I retweeted with a
comment. This week a person presenting themselves as a BitBounce
employee said t
ooking forwards to a prompt resolution,
>
> --
> Aymeric.
>
> Le 6 janv. 2019 à 10:35, Aymeric Augustin <
> aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org> a écrit :
>
> *[[ I'm adding BitBounce support to this discussion, even though I expect
> I'll just get
l
> just get one more of their spam — "we'll ignore the spam problem we cause to
> you until you pay money to us". ]]
>
>>> On 2 Jan 2019, at 01:39, Daniele Procida wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019, Daniele Procida wrote:
>>>>
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019, Aymeric Augustin
wrote:
>[[ I'm adding BitBounce support to this discussion, even though I expect
>I'll just get one more of their spam -- "we'll ignore the spam problem we
>cause to you until you pay money to us". ]]
>Here's
[[ I'm adding BitBounce support to this discussion, even though I expect I'll
just get one more of their spam — "we'll ignore the spam problem we cause to
you until you pay money to us". ]]
> On 2 Jan 2019, at 01:39, Daniele Procida wrote:
>
> On Wed, J
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019, Daniele Procida wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 1, 2019, Daniele Procida wrote:
>
>>If it continues to be an issue I will disable their receipt of email
>>temporarily. I assume I'll get the auto-replies myself to this message.
>
>One user's email receipt disabled so far; the user has be
On Tue, Jan 1, 2019, Daniele Procida wrote:
>If it continues to be an issue I will disable their receipt of email
>temporarily. I assume I'll get the auto-replies myself to this message.
One user's email receipt disabled so far; the user has been informed.
Daniele
--
You received this message
Nevermind, got the $999.99 reply as well :)
On Friday, December 28, 2018 at 10:23:07 AM UTC-6, Joshua Cannon wrote:
>
> I just got one for $2.00. So I assume either the two original "bouncers"
> fixed their settings and we have a new "bouncer" or one of them changed
> their dollar amount.
>
--
I just got one for $2.00. So I assume either the two original "bouncers"
fixed their settings and we have a new "bouncer" or one of them changed
their dollar amount.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions to Django itself
nchen>
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/urievenchen> <http://twitter.com/urievenchen>
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 3:47 PM, João Sampaio wrote:
> Uri, I have the messages from both those lists marked to skip inbox and
> not be sent to spam. Maybe you should try again? See screenshot attached.
&
Uri, I have the messages from both those lists marked to skip inbox and not
be sent to spam. Maybe you should try again? See screenshot attached.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
> Many messages of the Django developers and Django users mailing lists are
> sent i
Many messages of the Django developers and Django users mailing lists are
sent into my spam folder in Gmail, and I saw messages from other users who
experience the same problem. I can't filter these messages not to be sent
to spam because I want them to skip my inbox, and Gmail doesn'
The difficulty is tuning the spam weights. We had spammers completing
capchas and getting their posts through.
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 6:29:40 PM UTC-4, Zach wrote:
>
> I'm also trying to cc myself on tickets only to get "Submission rejected
> as potential spam&q
I'm also trying to cc myself on tickets only to get "Submission rejected as
potential spam". Can we incorporate this
<https://security.googleblog.com/2014/12/are-you-robot-introducing-no-captcha.html>
?. I've had better luck completing that verification.
--
You rec
gh!).
Well, this is a tricky experimenting business but I hope something out of
this works.
On Saturday, 6 August 2016 18:26:34 UTC+5:30, Tim Graham wrote:
>
> Yes, the bayesian spam filter is giving some false positives and the
> weighting is such that even if you submit the captcha, your com
Yes, the bayesian spam filter is giving some false positives and the
weighting is such that even if you submit the captcha, your comment still
might be considered spam (spammers were completing the captchas to submit
their content). You could look into if there's some other spam preve
Hi
Recently, I would say since the past week, many of my activities on Trac
are being reported as spam. Even trying to add myself to cc takes me to an
error page.
I got the following message when I last tried to modify a ticket. I was
changing the summary of one of the tickets
In the past couple hours, code.djangoproject.com experienced a spam attack
of new tickets and wiki pages. After running without the spam filter for at
least a couple months (I forget exactly when I deactivated it but it was
sometime after we switched to requiring authenticated users to file a
As MIDDLEWARE supports decorator-like objects you could simply add
`django.db.transaction.atomic' to it and you'd get each request wrapped in
a transaction.
Note that this will only start a transaction on the `default` database,
just like the old TransactionMiddleware use to do.
Simon
Le merc
Starting with Django 1.10 you can write a TransactionMiddleware again, and
we will probably ship one again.
On Tuesday, May 10, 2016 at 2:07:30 AM UTC+2, Kevin Tran wrote:
>
> Thomas, did you ever find a solution to your problem? I'm having similar
> thoughts and am looking for an answer.
>
> O
Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2016 02:07:30 UTC+2 schrieb Kevin Tran:
>
> Thomas, did you ever find a solution to your problem? I'm having similar
> thoughts and am looking for an answer.
>
>
Carl Meyer has worked out an enhancement proposal, here is the
pull-request: https://github.com/django/django/
Thomas, did you ever find a solution to your problem? I'm having similar
thoughts and am looking for an answer.
On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 4:18:53 AM UTC-8, guettli wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 04.02.2015 um 14:04 schrieb Anssi Kääriäinen:
> > I'd really like to be able to define middlewares that actu
Am 04.02.2015 um 14:04 schrieb Anssi Kääriäinen:
I'd really like to be able to define middlewares that actually work in
a well defined and easy to use way. Currently, there is no
guarantee(!) that either process_exception or process_response gets
called after process_request has been called for
Hello,
If you've subscribed to django-updates, you must have noticed that spam levels
have increased badly over the last weeks.
The spam filters are fending off about a thousand spam attempts a day, but a
small fraction (0,1-0,5%) gets through. Of course, we're deleting it as soon
x27;s using HTTP/1.0, which shows he's scripted the
requests. He's doing a GET, a POST and a GET every time. The first GET is
necessary to get the CSRF token. The POST sends the spam. The last GET is
probably just his HTTP library following the redirect.
Here are three such sequences from
On Monday, July 15, 2013 3:20:16 AM UTC+2, Ramiro Morales wrote:
>
> Would it be worth look at the web server log to see if these comments
> were effectively created by HTTP POST requests at all?
>
That's what I did to figure out the ip (which I blocked via iptables before
Aymeric played with
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Aymeric Augustin
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For some reason, ticket #542 has been collecting spam comments that bypassed
> Trac's antispam. Since receiving spam on django-updates and deleting it
> manually gets tedious after 100 messages, I ha
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Aymeric Augustin <
aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For some reason, ticket #542 has been collecting spam comments that
> bypassed Trac's antispam. Since receiving spam on django-updates and
> deleting it manua
Hello,
For some reason, ticket #542 has been collecting spam comments that bypassed
Trac's antispam. Since receiving spam on django-updates and deleting it
manually gets tedious after 100 messages, I hacked Trac to prevent further
comments on this ticket.
I'm positive that Trac&
Hi,
+1 in general. One concern, and one idea:
>
> -- Backwards-incompatible changes --
>
> * Some valid test structures in Django don't work with unittest2. For
> instance, tests in `tests/__init__.py` don't match a patter than
> unittest would recognize if running discovery on a module.
>
I
Hi Florian,
On Wednesday 27 February 2013, Florian Apolloner wrote:
> Hi Shai,
>
> On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 2:18:14 AM UTC+1, Shai Berger wrote:
> > > No, since the Oracle tests are somewhat slow we decided to just test
> > > one Python for now. I will try to see if Python 2 makes a differen
Hi Shai,
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 2:18:14 AM UTC+1, Shai Berger wrote:
>
> > No, since the Oracle tests are somewhat slow we decided to just test one
> > Python for now. I will try to see if Python 2 makes a difference, didn't
> > yet think of it.
> >
>
> Cool.
>
They do work on python2
Hi Florian,
On Tuesday 26 February 2013, Florian Apolloner wrote:
> On Monday, February 25, 2013 5:27:06 PM UTC+1, Shai Berger wrote:
> > the tests were only attempted for Python3
> > versions. Did you try to set it up for Python2?
>
> No, since the Oracle tests are somewhat slow we decided to ju
The problem is that it segfaults, when something like a segfault happens you
usually don't get more information than that... I tried to debug the segfault
but cx_Oracle or rather the instantclient stuff is installed without debug
information :/
--
You received this message because you are subs
On Sunday 24 February 2013, Florian Apolloner wrote:
>
> Yeah, I know about it and set it up on the CI during the sprints, it's
> still segfaulting somewhere :/
>
> http://ci.djangoproject.com/job/Django%20Oracle/database=oracle,python=pyth
> on3.3/12/console
>
Mybe it's me -- I couldn't get to
Hi,
On Friday 25 January 2013, Vitor Lima wrote:
>
> I was thinking in something like a feature to django-admin that will make
> an automatic ER(entity-relationship) model of the entire database. I think
> that this will help with documentation and with the projects that don't
> have an ER model.
On 11 February 2011 16:58, IanSR wrote:
> Trac won't let me add this as a bug/feature request, since it marks it as
> spam, so I'm sticking it here.
Did you try to register with Trac and login before posting the ticket
? You shouldn't have any trouble after that. Also, ther
Trac won't let me add this as a bug/feature request, since it marks it as
spam, so I'm sticking it here. This relates to the trunk SVN version of
django.contrib.formtools.preivew.FormPreview.
I've spent about an hour on this and realized that it isn't an easy fix, so
I
I just went through and deleted all of his edits.
Alex
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Christopher Petrilli
wrote:
> Just an FYI, but there's been hundreds of edits to add spam links in
> the last few hours. Might be worth locking it and rewinding the
> database.
>
>
Just an FYI, but there's been hundreds of edits to add spam links in
the last few hours. Might be worth locking it and rewinding the
database.
Chris
--
| Chris Petrilli
| petri...@amber.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django develop
th the search box). This is where it is by default in Trac
> > and people might expect to see it there, like I did myself initially.
>
> ... and why not have it say "Your post *will* be rejected as spam unless
> you are registered and logged in"? At the moment it sounds like
here, like I did myself initially.
... and why not have it say "Your post *will* be rejected as spam unless
you are registered and logged in"? At the moment it sounds like you
*might* get away with an unregistered posting.
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden+1 571 484 6266 +1 8
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Help me out here: how can I make it more obvious?
Wow, you've certainly made it more obvious :) I pity the fool that
misses it now.
Gary
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:36 AM, rskm1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Help me out here: how can I make it more obvious? You missed that;
>> others often do to. Can you share with me some insights on how you
>> missed it?
>
> I'll chime in. Basic rule of thumb for GUIs:
> * If it's going to fail
> Help me out here: how can I make it more obvious? You missed that;
> others often do to. Can you share with me some insights on how you
> missed it?
I'll chime in. Basic rule of thumb for GUIs:
* If it's going to fail _ANYWAY_, just GRAY IT OUT!!
In other words, make the form-input fields of
I see there is now a link to the registration page when you go to file a
ticket, but why not put it on page where the login/settings links are
(just underneath the search box). This is where it is by default in Trac
and people might expect to see it there, like I did myself initially.
signature.a
admap, Browse Source, View Tickets, Search.
I think you need to make the registration page more obvious, people
currently have to hunt for it. I'm not sure how the link to the
registration page was even removed as my accounts plugin for Trac put it
in there automatically.
The method I use to comb
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Andreas Klöckner
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I tried to submit this bug, but it wouldn't let me--it thought I'm a spammer.
>>
>
> Quoting from the ticket submission page:
>
&g
Mike Scott said the following:
> Maybe the page after the block submission needs to be changed. And
> maybe you could output a copy of the submitted text too just incase
> you didn't have a copy written elsewhere.
Something wrong with your browser's back button? :)
--
Collin Grady
Stay togethe
Jacob,
I think its the fact that we see "internal server error" and just miss
the message which is very nicely hidden after it.
Alot of django developers know what a 500 means, but generally don't
expect to see it for a spam block.
Maybe the page after the block submission need
how you
>> missed it?
>
> The sentence should be more prominent, I know nobody that will read that
> many lines, so maybe bolding "spam" and "register for an account" would
> make those a bit more visible.
Yeah, it does kind of get lost in the text there. The
that
many lines, so maybe bolding "spam" and "register for an account" would
make those a bit more visible.
Next step would be on the reject message "PLEASE, PLEASE *REGISTER* FOR
AN ACCOUNT TO AVOID BEING REJECTED BY *SPAM* FILTER". Not sure avoid the
caps...
Maybe poi
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Andreas Klöckner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried to submit this bug, but it wouldn't let me--it thought I'm a spammer.
Quoting from the ticket submission page:
"If you're getting rejected by the spam filter, we apologize! The
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 15:54 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
[...]
> Should be as easy as adding:
>
> imported = False
> if imported:
> raise Exception, "already imported!"
> imported = True
>
> at the top and reading the traceback?
No, because if it's reimported as part of a reload() or __im
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 15:32 +0100, Thomas Guettler wrote:
> [...]
>
> > No, it gets imported more then once: (Answer of Malcolm):
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg39061.html
>
> Read that ca
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 15:32 +0100, Thomas Guettler wrote:
[...]
> No, it gets imported more then once: (Answer of Malcolm):
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg39061.html
Read that carefully and you'll see the answer I have was "maybe, I'm not
sure" and it's only in some circumsta
Graham Dumpleton schrieb:
> On Mar 5, 6:56 pm, Thomas Guettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> AndrewD schrieb:> I would like to contribute a general Django logging
>> system. I have
>>
>>> MODPYTHON logging working, & a basic file logging sample. I think most
>>> Django users want easy l
On Jan 16, 2008 1:27 PM, Jorge Gajon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 16, 2008 8:57 AM, Jay Parlar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 1/12/08, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > The moderation could be done by member(s) whose time wouldn't be spent
> > > enhancing django
On Jan 16, 2008 8:57 AM, Jay Parlar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 1/12/08, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The moderation could be done by member(s) whose time wouldn't be spent
> > enhancing django. I used to volunteer on python.org to maintain the
> > Python Jobs Board, be
On 1/12/08, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The moderation could be done by member(s) whose time wouldn't be spent
> enhancing django. I used to volunteer on python.org to maintain the
> Python Jobs Board, because I wanted to help out, but I wasn't able to
> contribute in ways that
On 12-Jan-08, at 6:27 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> The moderation could be done by member(s) whose time wouldn't be spent
> enhancing django. I used to volunteer on python.org to maintain the
> Python Jobs Board, because I wanted to help out, but I wasn't able to
> contribute in ways that other
nauts
> enhancing django than cleaning up spam?
>
> I suspect that most people following the lists are getting the
> messages sent to their email accounts (instead of reading via web-
> interface), and then their spam filters are probably killing most of
> these.
>
> -Simon
>
&g
auts
> enhancing django than cleaning up spam?
There are already a number of us moderating the lists. At present,
it's a post-facto arrangement - we kill the spam when we see it, and
ban the spammer. And yes, it's a task that takes non-trival amounts of
time. Thanks for asking :-)
> I
The major problem is that someone has to moderate. Who does this?
Moderating would take a non-trivial amount of time - especially on the
high traffic django-users. Wouldn't we rather have djangonauts
enhancing django than cleaning up spam?
I suspect that most people following the list
> turbogears group[1] says.
> "New member posts' are held for moderation in order to avoid spam. If
> your first message doesn't show up immediately don't panic or re-send.
> A moderator will post it as soon as possible and change your posting
> status so future m
r to avoid spam. If
your first message doesn't show up immediately don't panic or re-send.
A moderator will post it as soon as possible and change your posting
status so future messages show up immediately."
So I was wondering if we should have a similar system here, and on
django-users,
7;,)
>pass
> ** /content of models.py **
>
> environnement : postgresql, django svn as of 07 dec. 2007
>
If you enter some session settings here:
http://code.djangoproject.com/settings
or (if that doesn't work) sign up for an account here:
http://www.djangoproject
This simple data model makes it impossible to display 'C' instance
list in admin pages (loads forever : eats up all memory) :
** content of models.py **
from django.db import models
class A(models.Model):
b = models.ForeignKey("B")
class B(models.Model):
i_a = models.ForeignKey(A, rela
On 7/3/07, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Subject says it all... just look at the timeline:
> http://code.djangoproject.com/timeline
I think I managed to purge the spam, and I've dialed up the blocking
prefs. Looks like it's a pretty large botnet attack so
Subject says it all... just look at the timeline:
http://code.djangoproject.com/timeline
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develop
Looking at http://www.djangoproject.com/comments/ there seems to be *a
lot* of spam.
Maybe you should try ubernostrums django-comment-utils
(http://code.google.com/p/django-comment-utils/)
--
Petar Marić
*e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*mobile: +381 (64) 6122467
*icq: 224720322
*jabber: [EMAIL
On 5/26/07, simonbun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Right, it slipped my mind that some people read these messages via
> email. It made sense to me in the groups.google.com web interface
> though. That way people didn't have to read the first 5 words of the
> topic befor
Right, it slipped my mind that some people read these messages via
email. It made sense to me in the groups.google.com web interface
though. That way people didn't have to read the first 5 words of the
topic before realizing it was spam. I "Report Spam"ed each message as
well, so
On Friday, May 25, 2007, at 06:53 AM, simonbun wrote:
>
> Sorry, I thought tagging and reporting the spam to Google would help.
>
Exactly, but better to just go to Google and do that than spread more
spam in this list.
There's no need whatsoever to acknowledge the spam within
On 5/25/07, simonbun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I thought tagging and reporting the spam to Google would help.
To report spam to Google, use the "Report Spam" button in Gmail.
Forwarding fresh copies of a spam message to the list does nothing
useful, and in the case o
Sorry, I thought tagging and reporting the spam to Google would help.
On May 25, 8:09 am, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 5/25/07, simonbun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could you please stop doing this. We are aware of the spam problem
On 5/25/07, simonbun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could you please stop doing this. We are aware of the spam problem,
and we are fixing it at the source as much as possible. Every time you
reply and change the subject, it makes cleaning up the mess that much
harder.
Yours,
Russ
On May 25, 5:50 am, rawebadvert3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Resumes and CV's examples written by people in the industry. They are
> the ones who know best what to write in a resume for that industry.
> High Tech people writing technical resumes and CV examples, and
> Teachers writing and advis
Maybe it's a good idea to human-filter these things out? Feel free to
pitch in :-)
On May 20, 9:30 pm, "Moona Naeem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Legitimate" Online Paid Survey Scams Revealed Part 1
>
> Are you looking for scam-free and legitimate online paid surveys, free
> membership online pa
Maybe it's a good idea to human-filter these things out? Feel free to
pitch in :-)
On May 21, 11:03 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Meet Singles In Your Area
> Arabs, American, Russian, Asian, Filipino, French, German, Indian,
> Italian, Lesbians Singles From All Over The Wor
Maybe it's a good idea to human-filter these things out? Feel free to
pitch in :-)
On May 21, 9:10 pm, "Moona Naeem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is Mark Warren's Ultimate Wealth Package Worth the Money?
>
> You could go take a college course in marketing or entrepreneurship at
> your local unive
On May 18, 4:11 pm, "Adrian Holovaty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Because the mailing lists are hosted by Google Groups, we have no
> control over fighting spam, other than the ability to make the lists
> moderated, which I don't think would be a good idea
On 5/18/07, Gerry Steele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Rania Desai wrote:
>
> Can anything be Done about the ridiculous amount of spam that is on this
> and the users list?
Because the mailing lists are hosted by Google Groups, we have no
control over fighting spam, othe
Blocking names of religious figures could be a good start
On 5/18/07, Gerry Steele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Rania Desai wrote:
>
> Can anything be Done about the ridiculous amount of spam that is on this
> and the users list?
>
> I'm on a number of
> Rania Desai wrote:
Can anything be Done about the ridiculous amount of spam that is on this
and the users list?
I'm on a number of other lists and they don't seem to have this problem.
-Gerry
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message be
Ville Säävuori wrote:
>> I miss the "Week In Review" blog posts from Adrian but surely he's not
>> writting those to have more time for coding :)
>
> Yeah, me too! It's very nice to read something "digested" about ongoing
> deveploment (from an insider) because following all trac changes and
>
> I miss the "Week In Review" blog posts from Adrian but surely he's not
> writting those to have more time for coding :)
Yeah, me too! It's very nice to read something "digested" about ongoing
deveploment (from an insider) because following all trac changes and
dev-list is sometimes not very eas
Michael Radziej wrote:
> I like Django, perhaps I rather contribute
> more tiny stuff of which I feel that it will get integrated, and I have
> my own patchset for Django. So what? It works fine for me. Why should I
> turn to a different framework when I like the concept and code (and the
> docs!)
Hi,
let me add my own view, and this is not a direct answer to Ian but more
to the whole thread.
I personally got frustrated about the way tickets are handled. And sure,
Adrian is currently a very scarce and important resource. There's
written enough about that and I don't want to deepen it agai
On 11/4/06, iain duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have to say that I think you're confusing arrogance with a desire to
> > do things *RIGHT*, and a lack of time on the part of the core devs.
>
> This however is part of the issue. With rapid growth comes that lack of
> time for the founders.
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
