Thanks for the explanations, but I'm still pretty convinced it may help :)
The initial docs we have from one provider appear to use an API rather than
SMTP apparently. Havn't looked into it yet myself, another one of our dev's
is working on that section. not even sure if we will go with these guys,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Mat Clayton wrote:
> I'm sure you have this covered but thought I would throw it into the mix. We
> are currently having lots of problems with blacklisting and spam filters
> blocking our email servers, one way we are investigating to avoid this is to
> outsource th
I'm sure you have this covered but thought I would throw it into the mix. We
are currently having lots of problems with blacklisting and spam filters
blocking our email servers, one way we are investigating to avoid this is to
outsource the email sending to trusted 3rd party services. We don't send
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Andi
Albrecht wrote:
>
> I've attached a patch to the issue on the tracker. The patch splits up
> the mail module into a package and provides the backend functionality.
> Documented functions and classes are of course available in the
> top-level module. Undocument
gt; Keith-Magee wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Zachary
>>> Voase wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Andi,
>>>>
>>>> On 21 Aug 2009, at 05:34, Andi Albrecht wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>&g
, Andi Albrecht wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm interested in working on #10355 "Add support for email backends."
>>>>
>>>> IMHO it's an good idea to make the email backend configurable. There
>>>>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Russell
Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Zachary
> Voase wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andi,
>>
>> On 21 Aug 2009, at 05:34, Andi Albrecht wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm interested in w
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Andi
Albrecht wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Russell
> Keith-Magee wrote:
>> A 'test email backend' (as well as a dummy no-mail-at-all backend, and
>> a log-to-console/log-to-file backend) is a different way to target the
>> underlying problem posed by
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Russell
Keith-Magee wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Andi
> Albrecht wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm interested in working on #10355 "Add support for email backends."
>>
>> IMHO it's an good i
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Zachary
Voase wrote:
>
> Hi Andi,
>
> On 21 Aug 2009, at 05:34, Andi Albrecht wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm interested in working on #10355 "Add support for email backends."
>>
>> IMHO it's an good idea
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Zachary
Voase wrote:
>
> Hi Andi,
>
> On 21 Aug 2009, at 05:34, Andi Albrecht wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm interested in working on #10355 "Add support for email backends."
>>
>> IMHO it's an good i
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Tim
Chase wrote:
>
>> In terms of the SMTP-specific settings (host, port, username, password
>> and use_tls), I personally feel that those parameters should be in the
>> settings module and not in the code. Although at the moment,
>> django.core.mail will use cert
On 21 Aug 2009, at 11:39, Tim Chase wrote:
> Having email settings defined globally precludes the ability to
> do things like create a web email application for which each user
> has their own email (usually SMTP/IMAP/POP) settings. While yes,
> I could see having some defaults at the settings.p
> In terms of the SMTP-specific settings (host, port, username, password
> and use_tls), I personally feel that those parameters should be in the
> settings module and not in the code. Although at the moment,
> django.core.mail will use certain settings if said parameters are left
> out.
Hi Andi,
On 21 Aug 2009, at 05:34, Andi Albrecht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm interested in working on #10355 "Add support for email backends."
>
> IMHO it's an good idea to make the email backend configurable. There
> are at least two use cases I can think of. T
Hi,
Andi Albrecht schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I'm interested in working on #10355 "Add support for email backends."
>
> IMHO it's an good idea to make the email backend configurable. There
> are at least two use cases I can think of. The first is to send email
>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Andi
Albrecht wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm interested in working on #10355 "Add support for email backends."
>
> IMHO it's an good idea to make the email backend configurable. There
> are at least two use cases I can think of
Hi,
I'm interested in working on #10355 "Add support for email backends."
IMHO it's an good idea to make the email backend configurable. There
are at least two use cases I can think of. The first is to send email
with other services than SMTP, like App Engine as n
18 matches
Mail list logo
