nd Bryan Veloso), and I think I can
> speak for all of us when I say that there's a general feeling that
> it's not worth our time to put any effort into a Django admin design
> overhaul, because it won't be taken seriously if it doesn't come from
> Wilson.
>
> And
Was passing by and gotta say that's really an issue that is wished to
have.
Thanks.
On Feb 4, 7:08 pm, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Adam Nelson wrote:
> > I don't suppose there's any way to get the patches from ticket #3591
> > into Django 1.2? If not, can it be marked
Hi everybody.
I use Django for about a year, do websites for about 5 years, am kind
of experienced in web, interface and techdesign, used lots of CMS or
other site management tools (99% is a piece of crab). And I'm writing
here because although Django admin default look is successive, I think
it h
Argh, thanks )
On Aug 19, 4:36 am, "Tom Tobin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:01 PM, tezro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all. Got a question unsolved yet.
>
> Wrong list — you want django-users. django-developers is for
>
Hi all. Got a question unsolved yet.
I'm making a news site on Django. App has e.x. 2 models: Type and
Element. "Type" is simply a definition of some type of news it
handles, literally its source info: title, site link, type_name (as
slug). "Element" handles the news elements with a foreign key
"
