Re: Is there a buildbot? Is there a waterfall? Do the tests pass against all backends?

2013-02-18 Thread Skylar Saveland
> > > you can see the tests at http://ci.djangoproject.com/ -- currently Oracle > is untested cause it's a major pita to setup on ubuntu. > Thanks for the info. If anyone is interested, I get 11 failures and 5 errors on master against Oracle with ./runtests right now: ===

Re: #7732 cx_Oracle SessionPool

2013-02-17 Thread Skylar Saveland
> Unless it fixes a release-blocking regression, it's not possible for > this to get into either of those release branches. That's what I thought; just checking. > Also, generally > we've been a bit wary of doing any kind of DB pooling at this level in > the stack... > Maybe this patch

Is there a buildbot? Is there a waterfall? Do the tests pass against all backends?

2013-02-17 Thread Skylar Saveland
Hi, I saw a very old thread talking about setting up a buildbot for Django. Did this ever go anywhere? Trying to run the tests against Oracle, I'm finding some that fail against my branch and master. For instance: ERROR: test_gfk_to_model_with_empty_pk (regressiontests.generic_relations_regress

Re: #7732 cx_Oracle SessionPool

2013-02-17 Thread Skylar Saveland
forgot to post the branch: https://github.com/skyl/django/compare/7732-oracle-sessionpool On Saturday, February 16, 2013 11:17:03 PM UTC-8, Skylar Saveland wrote: > > I have a branch on github if anyone is interested in taking a look. I will > gladly modify and rebase if it's

#7732 cx_Oracle SessionPool

2013-02-16 Thread Skylar Saveland
I have a branch on github if anyone is interested in taking a look. I will gladly modify and rebase if it's close to being acceptable (it could be badly flawed, I'm not sure). I would be interested in getting this (or something like it) into 1.4.X and 1.5.X. Might this be possible? -Skylar

Re: e-mail changed to email in email validator

2012-12-19 Thread Skylar Saveland
/17899 > > Best, > > Mark > > On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 4:23:24 PM UTC-5, Skylar Saveland wrote: >> >> I checked out 1.5 branch today and found a change that I can't find the >> debate/announcement for: e-mail to email in >> >> django/

e-mail changed to email in email validator

2012-12-19 Thread Skylar Saveland
I checked out 1.5 branch today and found a change that I can't find the debate/announcement for: e-mail to email in django/core/validators.py:validate_email = EmailValidator(email_re, _('Enter a valid email address.'), 'invalid') This change has me with # in 1.4.x it is: #error

Possible bug with GenericRelations and values_list

2012-12-10 Thread Skylar Saveland
Hi, I posted this in the django-users group but I think it may merit posting here, as well. I have a test case which I think should pass. https://github.com/skyl/django/commit/556df1c46146c2fc9c4022d838fa23f652f0ea8d Is this a bug? If so, is it a bug that is not in the tracker? Thanks, Skylar

Re: How to set the sucess message after inserting values to db indjango admin site

2010-04-21 Thread skylar . saveland
Ask on django-users. This list is for the discussion of developing django itself. sent from my baz foone -Original Message- From: Radhikavk Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:55:03 To: Subject: How to set the sucess message after inserting values to db in django admin site How to set the su

Re: High Level Discussion about the Future of Django

2010-04-15 Thread skylar . saveland
+1 I would love to join in with some liberal, even wild-eyed experimentation on github. I have all sorts of cock-eyed ideas that I would like to play with. I don't like patches; I don't like svn; I'm not a fan of trac. I do however enjoy the fact that Django trunk leans toward being boring and

Re: Getting Problem in connecting mysql (Help me please )

2010-01-28 Thread skylar . saveland
Ask user questions elsewhere. This list is for discussing the actual development of the django framework. You will need to install the mysqldb python adapter, mysqldb. sent from my baz foone -Original Message- From: rokson Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:48:53 To: Django developers Subject

Re: Backwards-incompatible change for model validation

2010-01-11 Thread Skylar Saveland
> Sorry for the problems, folks. Hey, no worries, thanks for the good work. Seems like a very usable solution. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. To unsu

Re: Model validation incompatibility with existing Django idioms

2010-01-07 Thread Skylar Saveland
> ModelForm has a save() method that saves the model. It is reasonable > to assume that if the form is valid, the save() method call should > succeed, that's why the entire model is validated. mf.is_valid() I have understood as validation strictly on the included fields in the form. I abuse this