On Feb 10, 1:13 pm, Johan Bergström wrote:
> Since Django executes my custom SQL before creating indexes, it's
> impossible to achieve something that hooks into initdb/syncdb. I know
> that it is "good custom" to create indexes after inserting data – but
> fixtures in Django is already executed a
On Oct 29, 8:06 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> You can already do what your proposal would allow in middleware as
> seen here:http://www.b-list.org/weblog/2007/nov/06/urlconf/
Yes, that's one way.
But there's an issue with this: it breaks reverse mappings, which I
use a lot
On Oct 5, 5:50 pm, "Karen Tracey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This mailing list is for discussion of developing Django itself, not usage
> problems with Django. Your question belongs on django-users, not here.
It actually has nothing to do with Django at all.
--~--~-~--~~---
On Jun 2, 7:12 am, The Code Janitor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is that I am loosing [sic] stdout and stderr.
Yes, that's how most FastCGI spawners work. They close all file
descriptors, and open a new socket, then duplicate that socket's FD
onto a constant known as FCGI_LISTENSOCK_F
> (1) Model.save(must_create=None) where "must_create" is True (must
> create), False (must not create) or None (try an update; if that fails,
> insert).
>
> (2) Model.save(method=DEFAULT) and this time "method" takes one of three
> constant values (making up the names a bit): "DEFAULT", "MUST_CRE
On Apr 21, 12:40 am, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> -1 here too, for exactly the same reason. Add to that the inevitable
> Murphyism that the one time you specify N=10 will be the time that the
> 11th oldest query will be the one causing the problem.
I agree, though my suggest
> Same goes for ignoring pyc files everywhere.
You can tell Subversion to add global ignores on your side of it.
See ~/.subversion/config. As for Windows, I don't know.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Mar 26, 5:38 pm, Thejaswi Puthraya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Improving the existing bindings: The existing bindings
> (http://www.pangalactic.org/PyPAM/) are bug-ridden with lot of memory leaks,
> hasn't been tested with python2.5 and don't expose the full C API.
> This part of the projec
+0, but I think it's the wrong way to go about it. What is needed is
an easy way to add to the skeleton, on a per-user (or rather, per-
Python?) installation basis. Not saying that all files from a certain
directory should be copied if they exist, rather something like:
python manage.py start
On Oct 30, 6:26 pm, "Jeremy Dunck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's always bugged me a little that choice lookups are based on the raw value.
Agreed, but bloating the API doesn't solve that.
Oh and a tip:
FOO_CHOICES = enumerate(("foo", "bar"))
Throw on a tuple() if you want to use the in
On Aug 31, 2:39 am, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Intially is_stored is set to None. When you do a .get or .create it
> would then set it to True. When you delete, it would set to False.
>
> A big that this does solve, beyond fixing my multiple pks, is explicit
> calls.
>
> - Calling .
Well actually, I see implementation leakage in the API here.
Does it make sense that the Django ORM raises SQLite3 exceptions? I
wouldn't want _to try to try to_ catch either of all integrity
exceptions.
Perhaps something like 'django.db.IntegrityError' or so.
Ludvig Ericson
--~--~-~-
On Aug 14, 11:19 pm, "Adrian Holovaty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/14/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I would suggest that rather than trying to make the --with-fixture
> > flag handle all this, it would be better to do this as a top level
> > command, i.e.:
>
> > dj
Don't see no harm in adding the close() hook, but as mr. Batchelder
said, I'd say it's the wrong thing to do.
If the connections really are dangling, I'd say there's a much larger
issue to deal with.
Sincerely,
Ludvig Ericson
On Aug 11, 1:57 am, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This
Any suggestions for what to do in the meantime? :-\
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe f
On Aug 2, 11:02 pm, Gábor Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> > On 8/2/07, Daniel Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I am recieving POST-data that is submitted to my application not via a
> >> form or a browser, but from other web applications, according to a
> >>
On Apr 29, 7:06 pm, "Adrian Holovaty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/29/07, Mike Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is there any interest or value in removing leading and trailing
> > whitespace as part of the forms.CharField clean method?
>
> I don't think it's a good idea to offer this
In latest SVN (as of writing) you see this in said file:
48 if getattr(new_class._meta, 'app_label', None) is None:
49 # Figure out the app_label by looking one level up.
50 # For 'django.contrib.sites.models', this would be
'sites'.
51 new_class._me
18 matches
Mail list logo
