Re: A setting that skips tests for thirdparty applications

2010-07-02 Thread lakin
ence. Depending on the team, the project it may very well be the project policy that certain tests shouldn't be run (such as the John-Scott's use-case). Thanks for the feedback. Lakin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developer

A setting that skips tests for thirdparty applications

2010-07-02 Thread lakin
p label to ./manage.py test as a command line argument. In any case, I was hoping to get a review/feedback on the patch. I'm more than willing to improve it in order to get it included. The original idea came from z...@nox.cx Lakin Wecker -- You received this message because you are subscribe

Re: Ticket 11967 review?

2009-10-21 Thread lakin
For the record, I used this to turn the 500 errors into 404's - which makes the severity of the ticket a bit lower as it's reasonably easy to work around the 500 email spam associated issue: RewriteRule .*\.(gif|ico|jpe?g|bmp|wmf|mid|rmi|rm|ram|au|wav|art|img)$ - [L,NC] Lakin On Oct 2

Ticket 11967 review?

2009-10-21 Thread Lakin Wecker
pache to treat this url as a 404 - and stop the 500 errors, but the fact that by default it generates 500 errors makes me think this is something that's important to get into a release. (Maybe along with the patch on #11191). Lakin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You rec

Re: Patch Review - #9638

2009-09-17 Thread lakin
Sweet, thanks a bunch! Lakin On Sep 17, 8:31 am, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 9:26 AM, lakin wrote: > > Does anyone have the time to review the patch, please? > > Looks good; I've marked it ready f

Patch Review - #9638

2009-09-17 Thread lakin
e the time to review the patch, please? Thanks in Advance, Lakin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroup

Re: FileField overwrite (Ticket #4339)

2007-12-08 Thread lakin
e the same file, it will still be preserved. (Retaining the non-destructive behavior). Lakin On Dec 4, 9:54 am, "Marty Alchin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 4, 2007 11:46 AM, Marc Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I agree on not commiting patches to a

Re: Templates: short comments {##} eats text

2007-04-25 Thread Lakin Wecker
Thanks Michael, Now that you actually said it, I realize that this is the conclusion I've been slowly coming too. Thanks for listening. Lakin On 4/25/07, Michael Radziej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 25, Lakin Wecker wrote: > > > I know that the de

Re: Templates: short comments {##} eats text

2007-04-25 Thread Lakin Wecker
bring it up here. I did, and was ignored. Which means that the list of possibly valid use cases are now scattered across the group archives. Lakin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django d

Re: Templates: short comments {##} eats text

2007-04-20 Thread Lakin Wecker
+1 on this as well. Another reason to allow newlines inside tags. Whitespace is whitespace is whitespace. Lakin On 4/12/07, Gabriel Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Apr 6, 3:31 pm, "Jonas Maurus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > If it ca

Newlines in tags.

2007-03-29 Thread Lakin Wecker
Is this a reasonable use case for asking that tags include newlines? Or is there a way we can shorten this tag that doesn't include shortening our variable names? Lakin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Upcoming Django release, and the future

2007-03-05 Thread Lakin Wecker
ross this bug: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3519 yesterday. This has me worried that there aren't as many django users testing with python2.5 and that we may not have fleshed out all of the bugs that may be present. It would be a shame to ship

Re: Proposal: Root view

2007-02-19 Thread Lakin Wecker
I am +! on this as well. Lakin On 2/19/07, Thomas Steinacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > What is the current status of the ROOT_VIEW setting? > > Are there any plans to implement this? > > I am +1 on this, because it would allow me to use o

Re: admin-interface: move up/down proposal

2007-01-20 Thread Lakin Wecker
I'd also be interested in looking at the files as as we were considering implementing this for a project we're working on. Maybe instead, we can take the time to abstract this into a field. Lakin On 12/19/06, Chad Maine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've built simi

Re: active tickets with patches

2006-12-06 Thread Lakin Wecker
Awesome. Thanks for the feedback Russell. I've been involved in bug-triage with Ubuntu and Gnome ... and what you're saying is right in line with what I would have done for them. I just wanted to be certain that I wasn't stepping on toes. Lakin On 12/6/06, Russell Keith-Magee &l

Re: active tickets with patches

2006-12-05 Thread Lakin Wecker
I am also interested in helping with this situation. I've run into quite a few patches that are reportedly working for some people.How do we help get these triaged? Lakin On 12/5/06, Nikolaus Schlemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > hi, > > while I really appreciat

Re: Re: Default representation of a Form

2006-12-04 Thread Lakin Wecker
as_dl() gets a +1 from me. I've used definition lists for forms and prefer it over tables. :) Lakin On 12/1/06, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 12/1/06, Ivan Sagalaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree that laying out a form with CSS is no