Hello David,
Is it possible to try to use it as part of the Django fork you mention,
instead of the app ?
I couldn't find any link on your github profile, your website and google
but perhaps I've missed it.
Thanks !
Best
<3
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
Hi Adam !
About 1, if it's already working with a non-signal, how could it not work
with a signal ? It is, after all, called from within formfield() in this
implementation, so anything that's working today when formfield() is
called, should work when formfield() emits a signal.
For 2 & 3, yes,
I'd like to support this, I've seen my share of situations such as the one
described by Patryk. Is there something we have been missing ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from
Django itself includes excellent i18n features for everything, except for
model data: but this can be improved, even in a multi-milestone fashion
starting with Claude's feature idea which is why I support it and I will
restrain myself from talking about internal implementation details which
con