son not to be performant by default.
>
> Marc
> On 23 Nov 2015 2:16 pm, "Jaap Roes" >
> wrote:
>
>> It’s considered a good practice to enable template caching in Django. It
>> saves on the overhead of loading and parsing templates and turning them
>> i
It’s considered a good practice to enable template caching in Django. It
saves on the overhead of loading and parsing templates and turning them
into template objects, which can give a nice performance boost when
repeatedly rendering the same templates.
Currently it’s possible to enable templat
et and patch that does so.
>
> On Friday, August 8, 2014 8:49:47 AM UTC-4, Jaap Roes wrote:
>>
>> First link is wrong, was missing a zero
>> https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/23260
>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fcode.djangoproje
First link is wrong, was missing a zero
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/23260
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:59 PM, wrote:
> Today I tried to use the unordered_list template tag with a generator
> (doesn't work https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2326). While
> investigating the code I notice
Today I tried to use the unordered_list template tag with a generator
(doesn't work https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2326). While
investigating the code I noticed that this filter does a lot of work to
support a fairly idiosyncratic form of nested lists
(https://code.djangoproject.com/tick
I've created a ticket with a script that demonstrates the issue and
provides an implementation that uses werkzeug's tempfile approach
https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/20536
Before I start forking on github I'd like some feedback on the ticket.
Thanks!
Op donderdag 28 maart 2013 01:23:52 U
