the multi-db branch to create the
Django and admin tables in a sqlite://:memory: database.
If this was possible then you could point the script at any database,
browse and edit, and leave it otherwise untouched. Which I think would
be pretty sweet.
I've posted this to developers as I think
ample:
def bare(self):
"Returns this form rendered as bare HTML for use in fieldsets."
return self._html_output(u'%(errors)s%(label)s %(field)s',
u'%s', '', False)
Haven't tested this but you would need to add this method to y
On 8/22/06, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like an integer field larger than postgresql's integer (2^31).
>
> Any interest in a patch for BigIntegerField?
Matt Croydon submitted a patch a while ago:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/399
I also think that
'mundane' could be better handled by expanding the wiki. Maybe a Supy
or Darkbot to handle FAQs? Anyone want to make a friend for the
logger?
Felix
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
James Bennett wrote:
> For example, Rails includes an "AJAX library" called Prototype; this
> library provides "AJAX" functionality in that it delivers a facility
> for making asynchronous server calls from the client via JavaScript,
> but it also provides a number of easily-used visual DHTML eff
